Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now I have a headache - Where were these guys during the campaign,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 08:43 AM
Original message
Now I have a headache - Where were these guys during the campaign,
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 08:54 AM by Mass
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=704543&mesg_id=704543

Though they have a point. How do we get the media to report on it?

Anybody get the Energy speech on the Senate floor to post there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. I second your frustration on this
This is one issue where the Democrats have been there. Kerry's words on this were very good - they just didn't get communicated by our media. (I got in trouble last week posting on a thread - where the op had as subject matter "where is Clark on the environment", then in the text it said that one of the bigger Democratic voices should speak on this". I posted about Kerry's record as Lt Gov and Senator - even mentioning Gore on global warming. I was essentially told it was a Clark thread (and why was it on DU-P, if only Clark comments are ok, shouldn't it be in the WC group) and I could start a Kerry thread. The other threads were long excepts from Wespac and comments about Clark's endoursement from the Senator who was the father of earth day (Proxmire ?).

I wonder if this thread will end up filled with Clark stuff from that thread. So, Kerry's (and Teresa's) record since the 70s of action as well as words on this was ignored versus Clark's stated positions. I hope Reid does make Kerry the spokesman on this as those issues come up in the Senate. Wouldn't it be great if John and Teresa could jointly speak on what can be done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am at a point where I dont care if Reid does. I want Kerry to be
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 09:14 AM by Mass
present on these issues, Reid or not Reid.

It is absolutely ridiculous. We need Kerry out in the media and speaking, whether Reid and Clinton like it or not. I want to see statements by my senator on the issues of the day, whether some like it or not.

One of the reasons why the latest guy who spoke is the hero is because the Democratic Party is lacking leadership (particularly on the Senate side). Time for somebody to stand up and speak out on a regular basis (the period late last year was great and Kerry was a great spokeperson. Why did it not continue?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think it will
I think that the Senator played out the hand that was dealt in Iraq. There was an election. There was a chance, however slim, for the Iraqis to do something after that election that might have resulted in some unity and in some coming together of the disparate elements in Iraq. There was a chance that the elections might have helped.

But, as Sen. Kerry stated in his Imus interview, that window is nearly closed now. The Bush Admin, once again, did nothing and the hope of this latest election to actually affect positive change has faded. Recent comments from Kerry seem to indicate a re-thinking of this and his comments that he was talking with Jack Murtha about the situation seem to indicate movement in another direction on what he wants to have happen in Iraq now.

Mass, it's still John Kerry we are talking about here. I wouldn't be surprised that if he is on 'vacation' he is actually reading up on everything and taking a 'walkabout' to decide what action he wants. It will never, ever be easy stuff with him. It's just not in his nature. I think he would want to come back with something well-thought out, I mean he always has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Which Energy Speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sorry, the one he made on the Senate floor for the Energy Bill vote/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looking for it - in the meantime
This was in the ANWR email and maybe useful:

1.INCENTIVIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY
More than 20 states have implemented market-based Renewable Energy Portfolio programs that require utilities to gradually increase the portion of electricity produced from renewable resources such as wind, biomass, geothermal, and solar energy. We should build on that success at the national level. Tell your Senators to enact a nationwide Renewable Portfolio Standard so that 20% of our energy comes from renewable sources by 2020. A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that implementing this policy would save $26.6 billion and that commercial and industrial customers would be the biggest winners.

2. PROMOTING BIO-ENERGY
We have the ability to transform our transportation sector from one that fuels our addiction to one that drives us toward a sustainable future. The President should build on that demand and fuel new production opportunities by supporting a mandate that agriculture will provide 20% of the total energy consumed in the United States by 2020.

3. INVESTING IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY
In addition to developing new sources of energy, we must make better use of available energy. New technological advances in appliances, energy grid systems, and buildings can boost productivity, create jobs, improve the reliability and safety of the energy infrastructure, and make dramatic inroads in reducing air pollution. Congress should enact energy efficiency measures to decrease energy use by 20% by 2020.

4. PROMOTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUPER-EFFICIENT VEHICLES
The government should provide an aggressive set of tax incentives and grants for consumers and for industries that are retooling plants to promote the manufacturing and purchase of hybrid vehicles, which run on a combination of gas and electric power to sharply increase efficiency. Twenty percent of all passenger cars and trucks on the road should be high-efficiency, low emissions hybrids by 2020.

5. SETTING AMERICA FREE FROM MIDDLE EAST OIL
Today, America spends more than $500,000 per minute on foreign oil or $30 million per hour. We paid more than $42 billion for Persian Gulf imports alone in 2005. It is bad enough that these dollars will not help grow our domestic economy — it is even worse when you consider their impact on our national security. Congress should act to eliminate America’s oil imports from the Middle East by 2020.

http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2277
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And his speech in Northern Ireland
Here's a quip about energy independence:

We must also, finally, liberate not only ourselves, but the Middle East itself from the tyranny of dependence on petroleum, which has frustrated every impulse towards modernization of the region, while giving its regimes the resources to hold onto power. The international community of democratic nations cannot afford to continue funding both sides of the war on terror. We must end the empire of oil. And these efforts have to be truly international — all linked to the rapid emergence of new energy technologies, in order to ensure that growing economies like China and India don’t just replace us as the enablers of Middle East despots.

http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2133
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Are the campaign proposals saved anywhere
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 11:50 AM by karynnj
His was very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I have a copy of the Kerry Edwards Plan for America
http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com/our_plan_for_america.pdf

It's no longer on JK.com for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Every speech, etc is on Vote-Smart.org
Here's a campaign speech on Energy -

Title: Energy Independence
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Date: 10/11/2004
October 11, 2004

Energy Independence

Remarks of John Kerry

For Immediate Release

Santa Fe, NM - Thank you, Governor Richardson for that great introduction. America may be in the grips of an energy crisis, but with Governor Richardson at the helm, there is no shortage of energy or enthusiasm here in New Mexico.

Before we begin, let me say a few words about the loss of a man who was truly America's hero - my friend, Christopher Reeve. Teresa and I were deeply saddened to learn of his death, and we send our prayers to his loving wife Dana, his children, and his entire family. Chris was an inspiration to all of us. Without leaving his wheelchair, he was able to make great strides toward a cure for conditions like his. His tireless efforts will always be remembered and honored - and in part because of his work, millions will one day walk again. As Chris once said, “So many of our dreams at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable, and then when we summon the will, they soon become inevitable.” I know that one day we will realize Chris' inevitable dream.

For 60 years, New Mexico has been at the leading edge of change and innovation. In a very real sense, we won World War II right here in this state. In the summer of 1942, with the scars of Pearl Harbor still fresh, Americans were gearing up for battle. Yes, planes and tanks had to be built at a record pace, strategies conceived, battles planned, and young Americans dispatched to frontlines around the globe. But Franklin Roosevelt knew that we needed something more. He knew we had to marshal America's most brilliant minds and best technology. The initiative he created was called the Manhattan Project, and it was headquartered at Los Alamos.

Today, we have an equally important challenge: to make America energy independent in the 21st century. Only then can we grow our economy as we should, protect our environment as we must, and keep our country as safe as it can be.
To do this, we need a president who will lead us there. We need a president who believes in America's great potential - and who believes that the middle class is America's greatest strength. We need a president who can see the problems facing America, and who will make the right choices to solve them.

But in the past four years, in nearly every decision he's made, George W. Bush has chosen the powerful and well-connected over middle class Americans.

The only people George Bush's policies are working for are the people he's chosen to help. They're working for drug companies. They're working for HMOs. And they're certainly working for the big oil companies.

The results are clear: 1.6 million private sector jobs have been lost. The cost of health care is up 64 percent. College tuition is up more than 35 percent. And the typical family is making $1,500 less each year -- while the cost of nearly everything continues to rise.

Right now, oil prices are at an all-time high, with no end in sight. In most parts of the country, a gallon of gas costs nearly $2 - up 30 percent since George Bush took office. In the last four years, the cost of heating the average home with heating oil has gone up 91 percent. And high energy costs have pushed up prices across the board - from the food you put on your table to the clothes your children wear.

A thirty percent increase in gas prices means a lot more profit for this President's friends in the oil industry. But for most middle class Americans, the Bush gas tax is a tax increase they can't afford. The funny thing is, George Bush is trying to scare you into thinking that I'm going to raise your taxes. But to borrow a saying, when it comes to George Bush's record on gas prices, he can run but he can't hide. Facts are stubborn things, Mr. President.

Four years ago, when he was running for president, George Bush said, “What I think the president ought to do is … get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say, we expect you to open your spigots!” Today, four years later, with gas prices at record levels, we're still waiting for George Bush to make that phone call! The spigot is nearly shut - his energy policy has failed - and middle class families pay the price every time they fill up the gas tank.

Instead of standing up for you, George Bush has chosen secret meetings with the energy industry behind closed doors in the White House, where they can make their case, but there's no one there to make yours. And then the president when all the way to the Supreme Court to protect the identity of his secret energy advisors.

And after four years of empty rhetoric and inaction, the Republican-controlled Congress is ending another session without passing a good energy bill for America. At the end of the day, George Bush just couldn't get it done. Just like with jobs, health care, and education, the President has more excuses than results.

Year after year, President Bush has proposed budgets that shortchange investments in clean, renewable, domestic sources of energy -- like wind, solar, and biomass. He ignores energy conservation. When it comes to developing a real energy policy, George Bush has run out of gas.

Just like on every other issue, they'll tell you they have an energy plan. But as usual, it's a plan that warms the hearts of their powerful friends and leaves you out in the cold.

Their plan includes tax breaks totaling nearly $15 billion for George Bush's friends in the oil and gas industries. The president's plan, not surprisingly, provides sweetheart deals for Halliburton - including an exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act so they can do more drilling. It's no wonder Senator John McCain has called the Bush bill the “No lobbyist left behind act.”
What's worse, the Administration's own economists have found that their energy plan won't reduce gas prices or reduce America's dependence on foreign oil. In fact, the Bush energy policy hurts other businesses and slows economic growth. For example, the airline industry will spend an extra $11.4 billion on fuel this year. Truckers will spend an additional $15.6 billion. And farmers will spend an additional $2.8 billion. Even the Chairman of the President Council of Economic Advisors admitted recently, “High energy prices are now a drag on the economy.”

Higher gas prices have cost the American consumer $34 billion since George Bush took office. But guess who's profiting from all this? That's right -- the people who wrote the energy plan in the first place - the big oil companies. The money you're paying at the pump is going directly from your wallets straight into the hands of oil companies and oil producers. Over the past three years, the big three oil companies have earned a record $38.6 billion in profits.

The Bush plan also threatens the environment by exempting all oil and gas drilling sites from parts of the Clean Water Act. It blocks efforts by 28 states to get oil companies to clean up polluted drinking water - and it saddles taxpayers with an $8 billion cleanup bill. And it opens sensitive wildlife habitats like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and Otero Mesa here in your backyard to big oil and gas drillers.

Worst of all, George Bush's plan does nothing to reduce our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.

Today, we are importing 2.5 million barrels of oil from the Middle East every single day. In the last four years, the amount of foreign oil we consume has risen to sixty-one percent. When they went to war, this Administration's energy experts projected that oil would be as low as $28 a barrel today. Last week, gas prices hit a record $53 a barrel - and one big reason is because of this president's gross mismanagement of the war in Iraq.

As president, I have a real energy plan to harness the full force of America's technology and make this nation independent of Middle East oil in ten years. My plan will increase fuel efficiency, lower energy prices, produce alternative and renewable sources of energy, and create new jobs here at home. I want an America that relies on its own ingenuity and innovation, not the Saudi Royal family.

My five-point plan will make America safer, stronger and more secure.

First, as President, I will speed up investment in technologies that save energy and create alternative fuels. Through a new Energy Security and Conservation Trust Fund, Americans will have a guaranteed commitment to reducing our dependence on oil. We only have three percent of the world's oil reserves. There is no way for us to drill our way out of this crisis. We have to invent our way out of it. American creativity has to drive the process - and new American jobs, good jobs here at home, will be our reward.

Today, the funding for our energy security is sporadic, uncertain, and insufficient. We may not have the greatest oil reserves on Earth, but we do have great resources of intellect and invention to find new fuels and to conserve and optimize traditional ones. So the trust fund I propose will take existing royalties that corporations now pay for the right to drill on public lands and dedicate that money to Research and Development so that we can have cleaner and more abundant energy sources.
We know that the road to more energy independence depends on making our cars and trucks more energy efficient. One out of every seven barrels of oil in the world is consumed on America's highways. That's why my plan contains economic incentives to build the energy-efficient cars, trucks, SUVs, and buses of the future. And I am determined that by the year 2020, 20 percent of America's energy will come from domestically produced alternative fuels like ethanol.

Second, my plan reduces energy bills for American consumers. Under the Bush Administration, many Americans will be spending $500 more this winter to heat their homes. My plan will rein in out-of-control gas prices for families, farmers and businesses by restoring American leadership abroad, simplifying gasoline rules, deploying our Strategic Petroleum Reserve when appropriate, ensuring fair competition in the energy marketplace and helping industry, schools and homes increase energy efficiency and cut their energy bills. To begin with, my administration will enact efficiency standards to cut the federal energy bill by 20% -- saving $2 billion a year. We will help states, municipalities, businesses, and consumers do the same.
Third, we will diversify sources of energy. For four years, this administration has sat by while our dependence on foreign oil has increased. My plan will focus on finding new sources of energy. We will make clean coal a real part of our energy future. We will ensure that by the year 2020, twenty percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources like wind and solar. We will seek new sources of oil in non-OPEC countries. We will increase the supply of natural gas by developing domestic natural gas sources that are already open for leasing and drilling. And we will enhance our ability to move natural gas from Alaska and Canada.

Fourth, our energy grid is vulnerable; it can and must be strengthened. The August 14, 2003 blackout resulted in the loss of electricity for more than 50 million people and cost our economy $6 billion. The footprint of the blackout on both sides of the US-Canadian border included great urban areas that are heavily industrialized and important financial centers. More than a year after the August 14th blackout, George Bush hasn't taken any action to ensure that the lights don't go out again. We will.
Fifth, we will create 500,000 new clean energy jobs in America by providing incentives to invest in clean energy technologies and encourage job creation. Here in New Mexico, in places like the new wind farm in Quay County, you've seen how investments in renewable energy protect the environment while they also produce new jobs.

America once led the world in the production of clean energy products and the payrolls that go with them. We have to do it again - whether it's in wind or biomass, solar or clean coal.

My friends, sixty years after the Manhattan Project, Los Alamos, Sandia and all our national laboratories continue to push the boundaries of knowledge. You can continue to strengthen our national security if we invest in your capacity to safeguard our environment and make America independent of Mideast oil. You understand that what's good for the earth is good for the people, good for our economy and good for a safer and stronger America. And you are leading with a uniquely American question: What if?

So much promise stretches before us. America needs to climb the next mountain, look to the next horizon, and ask: What if?
For the sake of our children…for the sake of our security … for the sake of our economy … for the sake of our environment … we must meet that challenge and make America energy independent of Mideast oil.

What if we do that? I know we can. We just have to believe in ourselves. Let's start making it happen twenty-two days from now!

Thank you and God bless America.
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=69451&keyword=Energy&phrase=&contain=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. This one paragraph in a brilliant speech says everything that guy wanted.
"Today, we have an equally important challenge: to make America energy independent in the 21st century. Only then can we grow our economy as we should, protect our environment as we must, and keep our country as safe as it can be.
To do this, we need a president who will lead us there. We need a president who believes in America's great potential - and who believes that the middle class is America's greatest strength. We need a president who can see the problems facing America, and who will make the right choices to solve them."

Too bad it was given by someone too obscure for the press to seriously cover - the then Presidential nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. On the Apollo Project
Title: John Kerry Says Apollo Project is the Kind of Strategy We Need to Achieve True Energy Independence
Location: Unknown
Date: 01/14/2004
John Kerry Says Apollo Project is the Kind of Strategy We Need to Achieve True Energy Independence
January 14, 2004

For Immediate Release


“The New Energy for America Plan released today by the Apollo Alliance is exactly the kind of satrategy America needs to achieve true energy independence. We can only succeed if we come together, like the Apollo Alliance has, to balance our priorities for the environment, energy independence and job creation.

“America's energy security depends on domestic, renewable energy sources. The Apollo Alliance is setting a course to that independence. In contrast, the Bush administration is continuing to take America down a path of dependence on foreign oil and failing to invest in new energy technologies. As president, I will reverse the Bush assault on our environment and end the control the energy lobby has over our government.

“Renewable energy sources are important because they are entirely under our control. No foreign government can embargo them. No terrorist can seize control of them. No cartel can play games with them. No American soldier will have to risk his or her life to protect them.

“I am proud to have worked with the partners in the Apollo Alliance throughout my career to ensure protect our environment and to promote energy independence. I applaud their efforts today and I look forward to continuing our work together.”

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=28305&keyword=Energy&phrase=&contain=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. There are a lot of references to energy independence
in so many of of his floor statements, press releases and speeches over the years. Searching through the Dem Daily archives there are not only speeches and press releases, but also reports from the MSM when this stuff is noted by them. Some of it is getting out there - problem is some people are NOT paying attention. Here's more links -

John Kerry’s Floor Statement on Inserting ANWR Drilling into Defense Appropriations Bill
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=1455

Senator John Kerry: “Real Security in the Post-9/11 World”
Council on Foreign Relations, New York City
December 8, 2005 - Remarks As Prepared For Delivery:
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=1340

John Kerry Says Energy Bill Fails Americans
July 29th, 2005 @ 8:01 am
Administration’s energy policy works for Saudi Arabia and big oil, but not for American people.
It’s time to tap America’s strength to control our own destiny.

John Kerry: Energy Bill Fails Americans
July 29th, 2005 @ 8:13 am
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=100

The Energy Debacle: John Kerry Was Right Last Year
August 2nd, 2005 @ 5:16 pm
Things look bleak in the realm of “oil- supply-and-demand.” Although Congress just passed the long awaited Energy Bill, it will have no effect on the oil crisis. None what so ever - “zero, by even its supporters’ admission.”
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=132

John Kerry on the Energy Bill: “The President’s Own Economists Found That This Policy Will Cause Foreign Oil Imports to Increase”
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=179


This should be the one you were looking for -

Below are the remarks of Senator John Kerry made late last night during Senate debate on the energy bill. Senator Kerry’s remarks follow as prepared:
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?page_id=99

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. MAss: This one??
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 11:59 AM by TayTay
July 28, 2005

All you have to do is look at what this bill does for the environment. There is in this bill an amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act. Do you know what it does? It allows unregulated underground injection of chemicals during oil and gas development so that we threaten clean water. Did anybody in America say, I think it is a good idea for us to have chemicals put into the underground water supply in order to bring out oil and gas? Why would we exempt it from the standards we have applied to our Nation over the course of the last 30 years? The oil and gas industry is getting an exemption for their construction activities from compliance with the Clean Water Act. Why would you exempt construction activities from compliance with the Clean Water Act?


Remarks on the Energy bill that passed.

If so, go to http://thomas.loc.gov/home/r109query.html
Kerry is the Senator
Senate only
First Session of the 109th Congress

Search terms< ahm, Safe Drinking Water
Sort by date
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. John Kerry Says Energy Bill Fails Americans - July 29th, 2005
John Kerry Says Energy Bill Fails Americans
July 29th, 2005 @ 8:01 am

Administration’s energy policy works for Saudi Arabia and big oil, but not for American people.
It’s time to tap America’s strength to control our own destiny.

Below are the remarks of Senator John Kerry made late last night during Senate debate on the energy bill. Senator Kerry’s remarks follow as prepared:

“Our nation’s energy crisis has reached historic levels. We need policy whose boldness is commensurate with that crisis. But that’s not what we’re getting. Instead, we’re getting a pork-laden lobbyist driven dream bill. It’s inexcusable.

“When you look at the outrageous gas prices leaving our families struggling to balance their checkbooks. When you look at our businesses struggling to turn a profit. When you see our children breathing air dangerously polluted by fossil fuels. When you read about rival nations streaking ahead of us in alternative energy technologies and creating high paying jobs that could have been ours. When you recognize our dependence on foreign oil has us entangled with nations who would do us harm. When you take all this into account, it’s clear this energy bill fails miserably.

“The Senate bill wasn’t perfect, but it was certainly better than this. The conference committee bill takes a huge step backward.

“The requirement that U.S. utilities generate 10% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020 is gone. The language recognizing the need to address global climate change is gone. And I don’t know how they intend to explain this one to the American people, but the requirement to reduce oil consumption by one million barrels a day is gone too.

“Instead, billions of American tax dollars go to the oil, gas, and nuclear industries, including a last minute, deal that gives another $1.5 billion to one of the most profitable companies in the world - Halliburton. Our children get weaker environmental protections and dirtier air and water. Americans get no relief at the pump, and we’re left just as dependent and probably more dependent on foreign oil.

“You don’t have to take my word for it that this energy bill fails to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. The President’s own economists found that oil imports will actually increase 85% by 2025 under a proposal like this. The President’s economists also found that ‘changes to production, consumption, imports, and prices are negligible.’ It doesn’t take an expert to understand we’ve only been graced with 3% of the worlds’ oil reserves. Saudi Arabia has 65% of them. We can’t drill our way to energy independence, we have to invent our way there.

“About the only thing this energy bill invents is new ways to fatten the coffers of big energy companies. The Conference version is not even a band-aid on the energy crisis itself, and leaves us worse off in many areas.

“Look at what this bill means for the environment. By amending the Safe Drinking Water Act to allow the unregulated underground injection of chemicals during oil and gas development, clean drinking water is threatened. The oil and gas industries receive an exemption for their construction activities from compliance with Clean Water Act. The energy bill also requires an inventory of offshore oil and natural gas resources meant to pave the way for offshore drilling along America’s coastlines, including areas off Florida where drilling is banned. This energy bill should have been a net plus for the environment. Instead, we’re going backward.

“We all know there are some positive provisions in this bill. We’re doing more for ethanol and clean coal, although certainly not enough. I’m encouraged by the strong new standards and consumer protections in electricity and the fact that we finally authorized Energy Star. But the bottom line is we should be doing better than this. We shouldn’t be going backward. The energy bill provides a unique opportunity to address many challenges at once.

“If we end our dependence on foreign oil, we strengthen our national security. If we lead the world in inventing new energy technologies, we create thousands of high-paying American jobs. If we learn to tap clean sources of energy, we preserve a clean environment for our families and future generations. If we remove the burden of high gas prices, American consumers can spend elsewhere and give our economy the boost it needs.

“This energy bill comes nowhere near taking advantage of this opportunity. And we all know how difficult it is to get an Energy Bill passed. We’ve tried a number of times - and this one time we get close we can’t afford to leave good policy on the table.

“First, we have a powerful opportunity to make renewable electricity the standard in the United States. The bill should increase our electricity supply from renewables by requiring utilities to generate 20 percent of their electricity from wind, solar, geothermal and biomass facilities by 2020. The renewable portfolio standard is a simple mechanism to diversify energy resources, stabilize electricity prices, and reduce air pollution and other harmful environmental impacts of electricity generation while creating tens of thousands of new jobs in the process.

“Second, we need to help domestic auto manufacturers build the cars, trucks and SUVs of the future. There’s no doubt the market for hybrids is set to take off. Over the next three years, the number of hybrid models will increase to almost 20, and by 2012, there could possibly be more than 50 models. These are real volumes, and real value. If we don’t build them, someone else will, and they will take our market share and take our jobs. Even under a business-as-usual scenario, the global market for hybrids by one estimate will be 4.5 million units by 2013 — perhaps $65 billion in the U.S. alone in just eight years’ time. We need to put American ingenuity back to work building clean, fuel-efficient cars. And just like in World War II, we need all of America to come together, to pitch in, to help solve these problems. That’s why any energy bill we consider should include both manufacturer and consumer incentives to encourage domestic production and boost sales of efficient hybrid and advanced diesel vehicles.

“Third, Congress can no longer ignore the greatest threat to the environment: global climate change. Higher temperatures threaten dangerous consequences: drought, disease, floods, lost ecosystems. And from sweltering heat to rising seas, global warming’s effects have already begun. But solutions are in sight. We know where most heat-trapping gases come from: power plants and vehicles. And we know how to curb their emissions: modern technologies and stronger laws. We need to pass an economy-wide cap and trade bill, and at the same time we need to re-engage in the discussions already taking place in the international community.

“Fourth, to ensure that technologies capable of providing clean, secure and affordable energy become available in the timeframe and on the scale needed, we need to dramatically increase our commitment to research and development. The bill should include provisions to dramatically increase federal government funding for new energy research and development, increase incentives for private sector energy research and development, and expand investment in cooperative international R&D initiatives.

“And maybe most important of all, we need to attack this energy crisis with the intensity our nation once showed with the Manhattan Project and the Apollo Program. Our competitors are showing this kind of urgency.

“A new national campaign in Japan urges replacement of older appliances with new hybrid products as part of their nationwide effort to save energy and fight global warming. In Germany, where heating is a huge drain on energy, a new law sets the standard of a ’seven-liter house’ designed to use just seven liters of oil to heat one square meter for a year. In Singapore, air conditioning is the big drain on energy, so new codes encourage the use of heat-blocking window films and hookups to neighborhood cooling systems which chill water overnight. In Hong Kong, an ‘intelligent’ elevator system uses computers to minimize unnecessary stops.

“If these nations can reduce their dependence foreign oil and invest in advanced energy technology, then surely the United States can. And their urgency is more than justified, because this goes beyond our economy. Energy is a legitimate global security issue.

“The era when the United States, Japan and Europe comprise the bulk of the world’s demand for oil is over. Oil consumption from developing Asian nations will more than double in the next 25 years, from 15 million to 32 million barrels a day. Chinese consumption will grow from 5 million nearly 13 million barrels per day. India’s will rise from 2 to more than 5 million barrels per day. This global race for oil is potentially a devastating destabilizing force.

“Increased American energy dependence further entangles our nation in unstable regions of the world and forces us to compromise our values. In exchange for oil, we transfer wealth to people who would do us and others great harm. This is as bad for our troops as it is for gas prices. We risk being drawn into dangerous conflicts, and an already overburdened military is increasingly stretched too thin.

“In recent years U.S. forces had to help protect the pipeline in Colombia. Our military had to train indigenous forces to protect the pipeline in Georgia. We plan to spend $100 million on a special network of police officers and special forces units to guard oil facilities around the Caspian Sea, and continue to search for bases in Africa so we can protect oil facilities there. Our navy patrolled tanker routes in the Indian Ocean, South China Sea, and the western Pacific.

“The reality is we have to protect the oil we depend on for our way of life. And this is a serious issue with real consequences because the unstable nature of conflict-ridden oil-producing areas challenges our economic security.

“In spring 2004, insurgents attacked an Iraqi oil platform. There was violence against oil workers in Nigeria. The result was depressed global oil output and record high gasoline prices. We were helpless to stop it.

“The most dangerous aspect of all of this is that we’re not alone. International demand for oil is heating up. At the rate we’re going the great powers of the world may resume the race to secure the remaining energy reserves. That’s an alarming scenario, but that is the course we’re on. With strong leadership we can avoid it, but we can’t do it without a balanced energy plan that ends our dependence on foreign oil.

“If anyone needs an example of how energy dependence can shortchange national security, look no farther than the War on Terror. If we assume oil miraculously drops to $30/barrel, over the next 25 years the U.S. will send over 3 trillion American dollars out of the country, much of it to regimes who don’t share our values. Today, America spends more than $200,000 per minute on foreign oil - $13 million per hour. More than $25 billion a year goes for Persian Gulf imports alone. It’s bad enough to think these dollars won’t help grow our economy. It’s worse to consider their impact on our volatile relationships with regimes like the House of Saud.

“And our dependence on foreign oil is a bad bargain in the War on Terror. In the past Hamas received almost half of its funding from Saudi Arabia. We know al Qaeda has relied on prominent Saudi Arabians for financing. Saudi Arabia sponsors clerics who promote the ideology of terror.

“The bottom line is the Administration’s energy policy works for Saudi Arabia, it works for big oil and gas companies, but it doesn’t work for the American people.

“Americans deserve better, and they certainly deserve the truth. That’s not what they’re getting when the Administration delays an EPA report slamming the fuel economy until after the bill passes, as we learned in the New York Times today. It tells you a lot about which interests this bill serves when the Administration doesn’t want people knowing the truth until after the votes are counted. And there’s no doubt the Administration and my colleagues Republican and Democrat who vote for this bill are going to sell it as some great national triumph. It’s not. This bill does a great job squeezing in a lot of pork and that’s about it.

“Washington failed the American people on this one. Whether it’s consumers at the pump, troops risking their lives to protect pipelines around the world, airlines struggling to survive, or kids breathing dirty air, everyone’s losing here. The minimal progress in this bill doesn’t come close to cutting it. And Americans will be able to judge the real world success of this energy bill every day at the pump. They won’t be fooled, and they’ll demand that we take steps to end the crisis with boldness that matches the severity of the crisis itself.

“It’s time to give America an energy policy that works for America and works for the 21st century. It’s time to tap America’s strength - our markets, our invention, our innovation and our values - to control our own destiny. We need to embrace and foster a revolution toward an energy world that benefits our environment, our economy, and most importantly our security. This energy bill doesn’t even come close.”

http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?page_id=99
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks KG. this is the one.
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 12:09 PM by Mass
I posted some of them in the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I just posted a couple of things too
This person is clueless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. A lot of headaches today.
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 12:27 PM by Mass
I just learned Feingold led the filibuster against Alito
:banghead::banghead::banghead:

I like Feingold, but some of his supporters are amazing. An old friend, and she probably realized something was wrong because the comment is (tried very hard).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. WTF? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Some were saying that last week too
Implying Kerry ran back from Europe to steal the publicity on it. What's strange is that from memory there was lack of knowledge that he would vote against cloture - and there were people already making excuses before the vote. I don't think he issued a statement on cloture or spoke in favor of a filibuster. BLM answered beautifully that in fact he was well positioned to do so, and didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. This is true
There were questions at the time if the Dem members of the Judiciary committee were compromised on this because the questioning of Alito in Committee had gone so badly. Feingold, Kennedy, biden, et all needed a non-judiciary comm member to announce the filibuster because they had blown it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. saw the post, that person is a freeper troll
full of disgusting shit as always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC