Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abizaid says U.S. may want to keep bases in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:11 PM
Original message
Abizaid says U.S. may want to keep bases in Iraq
Edited on Tue Mar-14-06 07:52 PM by fedupinBushcountry
The United States may want to keep a long-term military presence in Iraq to bolster moderates against extremists in the region and protect the flow of oil, the Army general overseeing U.S. military operations in Iraq said on Tuesday.

"Clearly our long-term vision for a military presence in the region requires a robust counter-terrorist capability," Abizaid said. "No doubt there is a need for some presence in the region over time primarily to help people help themselves through this period of extremists versus moderates."

Abizaid also said the United States and its allies have a vital interest in the oil-rich region.

"Ultimately it comes down to the free flow of goods and resources on which the prosperity of our own nation and everybody else in the world depend," he said.

http://in.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=...


Can't wait to see what JK has to say about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about that, this was probably the only plan they had figured out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow! Didn't he ask this about 4 times in one of the hearings
with Dr Rice saying No and looking at him with annoyance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, but
Cantbelieverher Lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here it is
Edited on Tue Mar-14-06 09:51 PM by TayTay
Sen. Kerry has that wonderful prosecutorial style of questioning. I love when he doe sthis. I absollutely adore the cutoff at the end. (Yeah, Condi, you're blowing smoke up my arse. I can see that. No need to explain.)

KERRY: Thank you, Madam Secretary.

The other day, General Kimmitt, Mark Kimmitt, gave a speech in London to the Institute of Strategic Studies, wherein he reportedly said the United States will not maintain any long-term bases in Iraq.

KERRY: Our position is, when we leave, we won't leave any bases there.

I wrote to General Pace to follow up on this, and General Pace wrote me back and said: "At present, the Department of Defense has no plans for the permanent basing of U.S. forces in Iraq."

This has long been an issue of contention.

So, you know, General Casey has said, "The sense of American occupation is part of what feeds the insurgency."

The administration, however, has never formally said, "We're not going to have permanent bases."

So I would ask you today: Is it, in fact, the policy of this administration not to have permanent basing in Iraq?

RICE: I think General Pace has spoken to that, Senator, and he speaks for the administration.

Senator, our job now is to use our forces to help the Iraqis gain control of their own security environment, to train their forces to protect our people who need to go out in the field to be a presence outside of Baghdad.

That is the purpose of our forces.

As the president said, we don't want to be there one day longer than we need to be.

KERRY: I understand that, and we all want that transition. I'm just trying to figure out what the long term is, because I don't think the administration has actually said that before with clarity.

So if you're affirming today what the generals have said as the policy, that's a step forward.

RICE: Well, Senator, I think General Pace has spoken to this.

I don't want to, in this forum, try and prejudge everything that might happen all the way into the future. The policy of this administration is to, as quickly as possible, turn over responsibility for security to the Iraqis and, as the president said, we will be very pleased the day when American forces can come home. KERRY: So the conclusion for what you've just said is that the civilian leadership, which is how we lead the military in the United States, has a different position from the uniformed leadership -- which is you're reserving the right to make that decision in the future?

RICE: Senator, I said I'm not going to try to speak to something that is that far into the future.

KERRY: I heard what you said. I understand.

RICE: We are...

KERRY: No, I understand.

RICE: Yes. Sorry.

KERRY: I got your answer.


Methinks the military got the memo and is now on board with the permanent bases ideer. Sigh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. My husband's take on this story
It says it all, we went to war for oil, and if we want to keep our hands on it, we have to keep up residence. The truth comes out in this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC