Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Co-sponsoring bill to fix Patriot Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 01:56 PM
Original message
Kerry Co-sponsoring bill to fix Patriot Act
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 01:56 PM by TayTay
And restore most of it to the provisions of the bill that the Senate passed unanimously last summer. Interesting. i don't have the text, Sen. Specter is just now talking about this on the floor of the Senate.

Guess they were trying to get this thing passed and fixed. This is a quick filing of a bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just saw that.
Wild :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cool n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. You should post this in GDP or GD
They were really pissing on Kerry with that and Email this to Malloy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks!
Al I had was the thing I heard on C-Span. I will post on GD tomorrow as soon as I have text to back this up. (There is noting yet to back anything up on GD, no text, no bill on Thomas, nothing. Let me get some more solid info and then do a GD post. This was just an initial C-Span conversation. I want more info first and something to point to on GD to show what really happened.)

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Okay I'm glad Kerry is taking action though
I was so disappointed with his vote on the bill so I'm glad to have faith in him again. :D Just when I start to lose that faith he does something to prove my doubt wrong. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You have to have faith. John Kerry ALWAYS knows exactly what he is
doing. I learned years ago never to second guess him. He's not always right, but I'd say he's right pretty close to 99% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Waiting (impatiently) for a statement
from the Senator's office on this. :)

Curiouser and curiouser...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this it?
By Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SALAZAR, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. KERRY ):

S. 2369. A bill to require a more reasonable period for delayed-notice search warrants, to provide enhanced judicial review of FISA orders and national security letters, to require an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order, and to create national security letter sunset provisions; to the Committee on the Judiciary.


Seems everyone is on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. This really makes sense -
There was no way we were going to get the Senate bill of last year. This puts the new PA bill in effect rather than the original one - which is an improvement, while these additional issues are fought over. Seems better than a series of extentions, leaving the origional act in place, and bitter arguments in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 04:45 PM by ProSense
think you can post links to this group in GD-P. Just cut and paste the info without the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sorry - I jthought it was ok
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 04:51 PM by karynnj
I edited it - I just didn't want to steal it. That thread is just so toxic - and unreasonable. Are you going to post it as it's own thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Between
us, it's sharing.

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Ok, thanks - it's all fixed now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Text
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 12:14 PM by ProSense
109th CONGRESS

2d Session

S . 2369
To require a more reasonable period for delayed-notice search warrants, to provide enhanced judicial review of FISA orders and national security letters, to require an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order, and to create national security letter sunset provisions.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 6, 2006
Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SALAZAR, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To require a more reasonable period for delayed-notice search warrants, to provide enhanced judicial review of FISA orders and national security letters, to require an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order, and to create national security letter sunset provisions.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON REASONABLE PERIOD FOR DELAY.

Section 3103a(b)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `30 days' and inserting `7 days'.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FISA ORDERS AND NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS.

(a) FISA- Subsection (f)(2) of section 501 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861) is amended

(1) in subparagraph (A)(i)--

(A) by striking `a production order' and inserting `a production order or nondisclosure order'; and

(B) by striking `Not less than 1 year' and all that follows through the end of the clause;

(2) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking `production order or nondisclosure'; and

(3) in subparagraph (C), by striking clause (ii) and redesignating clause (iii) as clause (ii).

(b) Judicial Review of National Security Letters- Section 3511(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking `If, at the time of the petition,' and all that follows through the end of the paragraph; and

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking `If the recertification that disclosure may' and all that follows through `made in bad faith.'.

SEC. 3. FACTUAL BASIS FOR REQUESTED ORDER.

Section 501(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861(b)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows:

`(A) a statement of facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records or other things sought--

`(i) are relevant to an authorized investigation (other than a threat assessment) conducted in accordance with subsection (a)(2) to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a United States person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities; and

`(ii) either--

`(I) pertain to a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;

`(II) are relevant to the activities of a suspected agent of a foreign power who is the subject of such authorized investigation; or

`(III) pertain to an individual in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power; and'.

SEC. 4. NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER SUNSET.

Section 102 of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199, 109th Congress, 2d Session) is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(c) Other Sunsets-

`(1) IN GENERAL- Effective December 31, 2009, the following provisions are amended so that they read as they read on February 27, 2006:

`(A) Section 2709 of title 18, United States Code.

`(B) Sections 626 and 627 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681u, 1681v).

`(C) Section 1114 of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (12 U.S.C. 3414).

`(D) Section 802 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 436).

`(2) EXCEPTION- With respect to any particular foreign intelligence investigation that began before the date on which the provisions referred to in paragraph (1) cease to have effect, or with respect to any particular offense or potential offense that began or occurred before the date on which such provisions cease to have effect, such provisions shall continue in effect.'.

SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Amendments to provisions of law made by this Act are to such provisions, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199, 109th Congress, 2d Session) and by the USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (S . 2271, 109th Congress, 2d Session).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC