Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chain gun looked at as possible .50 cal replacement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 06:09 AM
Original message
Chain gun looked at as possible .50 cal replacement
Chain gun looked at as possible .50 cal replacement
By Kris Osborn
Posted: 10/09/07 17:50

AUSA 2007, WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Army weapons developers at Picatinny Arsenal, N.J., and European manufacturers such as Sweden-based Bofors are eyeing ATK’s Lightweight 25mm (LW25) Bushmaster chain gun, a high-tech, high-speed next-generation weapon able to fire up to seven times as many rounds between jams as the ubiquitous .50-caliber machine gun, ATK officials say.

Beginning 18-months ago, Minnesota-based ATK began developing the 63-pound chain gun to meet an emerging need, ATK officials said.
“As the Army started evolving toward wanting more lethality in their smaller vehicles and wanting remote weapons stations on their smaller vehicles, we saw that as a market niche and developed the weapon,” said Jim Cates, ATK’s vice president of medium caliber systems.

Once additional test firing is completed for system qualification, the LW 25 will be ready for production in about a year and a half, Cates said.

Designed as a possible replacement for the .50 caliber and the Mk 19 40mm grenade launcher; the LW 25 is configured to fire from rapidly increasing remote weapons stations used by soldiers in hostile areas to shoot targets from inside a combat vehicle. A computer screen showing the surrounding terrain displays the target areas to soldiers who use a joystick to zero in on enemy targets and fire the gun mounted on the roof of the vehicle.

“You are seeing the Army evolve as a result of the conflict in Iraq which includes the need for more remote weapons stations so people can fire their weapons under armor as opposed to standing outside the vehicle. The advantage to our guns is they are inherently remotely operable. They’re electrically driven. They are not gas-operated cannons, so they are already remotely operable,” said Cates.

Rest of article at: http://www.armytimes.com/news/ausa/story.php?F=3098546



uhc comment: You can see the wonderful toys the military-industrial-complex is developing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Islander Expat Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its so fucking dangerous over there gunners can't even risk exposure to fire their weapons?
Or has the "front sight on target" school of thought been abandoned in favor of incredibly wasteful "hosing down" technique?

Hope they got plenty of ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC