Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army: Dead Soldier Wore Body Armor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:50 AM
Original message
Army: Dead Soldier Wore Body Armor
Army: Dead Soldier Wore Body Armor
September 03, 2008
Colorado Springs Gazette

The Army today said all Fort Carson Soldiers wear their body armor and helmets on patrol In Iraq, including a 3rd Brigade Combat Team Soldier whose family said he was killed after being told he didn't need a protective vest for a "friendly" patrol.

The family told newspapers in Missouri and Alabama that Spc. Steven Fitzmorris was sent on a patrol last week in Baghdad without the Kevlar and steel armor because the unit was headed to a safe area. The family said the information came from "unofficial" Army sources.

Rosemarie Fitzmorris-Currier, the Soldier's mother, told The Opelika Auburn News in Alabama that the Army was also late in telling the family about the death.

"I am not going to let this story be hidden under layers of military garbage," she told the newspaper. "My son deserves better than that."

Fitzmorris-Currier and other family members couldn't be reached for comment today.


Rest of article at: http://www.military.com/news/article/army-dead-soldier-wore-body-armor.html?col=1186032310810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blaubart Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it too much to ask...
I'm new here, so I don't want to rock the boat too much, but in most of the other forums I've visited, when people post articles from various news agencies, they also post their opinion on the article or the topic at hand.

What is the story here that might get hidden beneath "layers of military garbage"?

That her son might not have been wearing his protective gear? That someone might have told her that he wasn't when he actually was? That someone failed to keep a current address on file for his mother? (When I was in the Army, that was the soldier's responsibility)

It is regrettable that her son died, but I don't find anything else in the article that has any substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lack of substance is not unusual for stuff coming from the military rags.
I've been doing this for a while now, and you'll sometimes see a 'uhc comment:' at the end of article - that's where I put my two cents in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC