Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

40th anniversary of Tet Offensive marked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:31 PM
Original message
40th anniversary of Tet Offensive marked


Saigon burns in the background during the Tet offensive in February 1968.


40th anniversary of Tet Offensive marked
By Fred L. Borch and Robert F. Dorr - Special to the Times
Posted : Thursday Jan 31, 2008 10:42:42 EST

Just over 40 years ago, on Jan. 30, 1968, the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong launched a series of widespread and coordinated attacks against U.S. and allied forces in South Vietnam.

The assault coincided with Tet, the beginning of the lunar year and an important holiday in Vietnam. Although U.S. and South Vietnamese troops held fast against the attacks and inflicted massive casualties, what amounted to a military victory on the battlefield became, in some respects, a defeat for U.S. political goals. Public opinion in the U.S., already beginning to turn against the war, looked at Tet as evidence that U.S. participation in Vietnam was too costly.

The intent of the North Vietnamese and their Viet Cong allies was to crush the Army of (South) Vietnam, the ARVN, and trigger a popular uprising among the civilian population against the South Vietnamese government. To achieve these goals, the enemy attacked five major cities, 36 provincial capitals and 64 district capitals. Additionally, they attacked numerous hamlets and the Tan Son Nhut Air Base near Saigon. Finally, in an attempt to deliver a decisive psychological blow, the enemy attacked — and penetrated — the U.S. Embassy in Saigon.

U.S. troops at Tan Son Nhut withstood the attack but did so in an extraordinary reversal of roles: Most of the ground troops were Air Force and most of the air cover was provided by the Army.

The enemy had deceitfully agreed with the South Vietnamese to a cease-fire to celebrate Tet. Although U.S. military intelligence discerned that an attack might occur, the information was ignored for three reasons. First, the Americans believed that the enemy would not violate the cease-fire. Second, senior U.S. commanders did not think that the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong were capable of launching major combat operations. Third, the Army and Marines were preoccupied with the ongoing siege at Khe Sanh, which had started Jan. 21 and would last 77 days.


Rest of article at: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/01/army_history_080131w/



uhc comment: I was at Chu Lai when the shit hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was 14....my older brother was a freshman in college....
...who never guessed that within 2 years he'd be drafted or that he'd turn 21 in the Ah Shau (spelling?) valley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yea, though I walk thru the valley of Death
I shall fear no evil
For I am the evilist motherfucker in the valley.


Ask him if he remembers that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC