Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

History of Davis-Bacon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Race & Ethnicity » African-American Issues Group Donate to DU
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:52 PM
Original message
History of Davis-Bacon
What do you think? I think suspending the act helps keep downward pressure on wages. There's nothing preventing contractors from hiring non-union labor and paying them based on their skill levels. Or, is it mandatory that the union be involved in all construction...?

...

The law was introduced and passed to block wage competition from black construction workers after an Alabama contractor's successful bid on a federal construction project on Long Island in 1927.

The Bacon in Davis-Bacon was Long Island Congressman Robert Bacon. "The neighboring community was very upset," he explained. He also stressed that his call to pay "prevailing wages" on federal construction projects had the endorsement of the president of the American Federation of Labor, who had noted that "colored labor is being brought in to demoralize wage rates."

At the time Davis-Bacon was enacted, the black unemployment rate was similar to that of the general population. A year later, of the 4,100 workers employed on the Boulder Dam project, only 30 were black. Davis-Bacon had fulfilled its promise. More than 30 states soon enacted their own versions.

Hiring local labor to rebuild their own communities is hard when you must pay anyone willing to hit a nail with a hammer the same rate as a union carpenter. The act effectively excludes nonunion workers and contractors from reconstruction projects. At the same time, it adds billions in costs and makes it harder to bring low-skilled, unemployed minorities into the work force.


...

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
cleofus1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. i call it
the leave no white person behind program
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And, the irony that it was enacted to protect against the 'cheap labor'
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 01:00 AM by msgadget
of that day - black folks - repealing it is supposed to help minority contractors to compete...by continuing to use cheap labor. I'll be watching to see how many minority contractors participate.

Edit for clarification (which may not have helped!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Race & Ethnicity » African-American Issues Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC