Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intel's test: buy the PC, then pay for more speed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 06:51 AM
Original message
Intel's test: buy the PC, then pay for more speed
http://www.physorg.com/news204305952.html

What if you bought a house and were told there's a secret rooftop deck you'll have to pay extra to access? If you're shopping for a personal computer this holiday season, you might get that kind of proposition from an unlikely source: Intel Corp., the world's biggest maker of personal computer processors.

Intel is including Pentium chips that are better than advertised in some low-end desktop computers. But to unlock their full power, buyers will need to a pay an extra fee.

The company says the program will enable people who have bought inexpensive PCs to upgrade them cheaply, through the Internet.

It's only a test so far, with the goal of gathering feedback.

News of the test has slipped onto technology blogs, and has rankled some hardcore techies because it asks people to pay extra for things the chips are already capable of doing.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder how long before the crack comes out.
In my personal experience, I've found AMD processors to much more reliable-and a lot easier to overclock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is almost as good as the copiers sold about 15 years back
that printed too fast for the manufacturer's market strategy: so the manufacturer added another step to the process to damage the chips selectively and sold the slower copies in bulk at a reasonable price but sold the undamaged (easier and cheaper to manufacture) fast copiers for 5x the price

It's about as good as the Coke vending machines (from the same greedy era) that contained a thermometer and adjusted the asking price depending on how hot is was
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Intel's upgradable processor: good sense or utter catastrophe?
By Peter Bright | Last updated September 22, 2010 12:01 PM

... The Pentium G6951 is a low-end processor. Dual core, 2.8GHz, 3 MB cache ... Buy an unlock code for around $50 ... and your processor will get two new features: hyperthreading will be enabled, and another 1 MB of cache will be unlocked, giving the chip a specification just short of Intel's lowest Core i3-branded processor, the 2.93 GHz Core i3-530 ... The processors will ship as part of a pilot program next quarter to a select number of resellers in ... US, Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain ... OEMs will receive kickbacks for any systems that get upgraded in this way through a revenue-sharing system ... http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2010/09/intels-upgradable-processor-good-sense-or-utter-catastrophe.ars

don't much agree with the editorial slant there, but the piece has some useful info
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. This will not end well for Intel.
The crack will be widely available within weeks, perhaps even days.

I'm assuming the procedure utilizes some sort of automated, foolproof flash of the BIOS. Hell, cracking the thing could be argued to be perfectly legal, as Intel isn't selling software here, but a repair to an intentionally defective product.

Didn't the FCC (or another agency) recently find that jailbreaking iDevices doesn't violate the DMCA? Seems to me that would apply here as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC