Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Star That Should Not Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:23 AM
Original message
The Star That Should Not Exist


ScienceDaily (Aug. 31, 2011) — A faint star in the constellation of Leo (The Lion), called SDSS J102915+172927 <1>, has been found to have the lowest amount of elements heavier than helium (what astronomers call "metals") of all stars yet studied. It has a mass smaller than that of the Sun and is probably more than 13 billion years old.

"A widely accepted theory predicts that stars like this, with low mass and extremely low quantities of metals, shouldn't exist because the clouds of material from which they formed could never have condensed," <2> said Elisabetta Caffau (Zentrum fur Astronomie der Universitat Heidelberg, Germany and Observatoire de Paris, France), lead author of the paper. "It was surprising to find, for the first time, a star in this 'forbidden zone', and it means we may have to revisit some of the star formation models."

The team analysed the properties of the star using the X-shooter and UVES instruments on the VLT <3>. This allowed them to measure how abundant the various chemical elements were in the star. They found that the proportion of metals in SDSS J102915+172927 is more than 20 000 times smaller than that of the Sun <4><5>.

"The star is faint, and so metal-poor that we could only detect the signature of one element heavier than helium -- calcium -- in our first observations," said Piercarlo Bonifacio (Observatoire de Paris, France), who supervised the project. "We had to ask for additional telescope time from ESO's Director General to study the star's light in even more detail, and with a long exposure time, to try to find other metals."

more

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110831155340.htm
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Love it when science has to frantically rethink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. you must really love science then, 'cause that's what science IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Right on! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yup. Yup. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's my theory
This is the remnants of a star that went supernova and its entire cloud of ejected gas, dust and heavy elements were sucked away by a black hole or passing rogue star.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. if that is true
wouldnt ONLY heavy elements be left behind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stars are just a theory according to the teabaggers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe a power source for a very advanced civilization?
Maybe it's being mined?

It is predicted that we will eventually harness star energy directly if we're lucky enough to survive a few million years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. A white dwarf that was victim of a drive by?
Perhaps this was a regular white dwarf, originally a bit smaller than average, that had some mass ripped off by a close pass with another star? A small white dwarf would have some calcium, but could it have aged to that point of its life cycle by now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC