Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Antimatter belt around Earth discovered by Pamela craft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 05:48 AM
Original message
Antimatter belt around Earth discovered by Pamela craft
(snip)
A thin band of antimatter particles called antiprotons enveloping the Earth has been spotted for the first time.

The find, described in Astrophysical Journal Letters, confirms theoretical work that predicted the Earth's magnetic field could trap antimatter.
(snip)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14405122
Refresh | +19 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting note:
Dr Bruno said that, aside from confirming theoretical work that had long predicted the existence of these antimatter bands, the particles could also prove to be a novel fuel source for future spacecraft - an idea explored in a report for Nasa's Institute for Advanced Concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cool Logic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. "the particles could also prove to be a novel fuel source for future spacecraft"
Or maybe even a replacement for fossil fuels and nuclear energy.

I have a feeling that in the not so distant future, solar panels and windmills will appear to have been very primitive attempts at generating green energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And not the too distant past..... must see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. That does sound exciting
How difficult would it be to engineer an efficient means of harvesting it though? Assuming we have a launch capability to reach the belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Good question.... it would have to be done with a mechanism that is able to funnel them
down into a magnetic bottle of some sort. I think that is how they hold them now but I don't believe they can hold them for very long, yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. I absolutely love the picture depicting the visual of what happens
to the protons when:" Antiprotons "annihiliate" if they come into contact with normal protons" Not sure what that means...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It means they transform from 2 particles into other forms of energy
Typically, particle-antiparticle collisions result in their transformation into gamma rays.

This is the process behind positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The patient is injected with radioactive tracer molecules, and those undergo decays in which positrons - which are anti-electrons - are released. The positrons very quickly encounter electrons, and the electron-positron pairs "annihilate," releasing (in most cases) two gamma rays that travel in almost opposite directions. Detectors surrounding the patient absorb (some of) the gamma rays; when two register counts simultaneously it's a sign that some of the tracer was on a line between the two detectors, and from that information an image of the tracer's distribution in the body can be reconstructed.

Getting back to this article, using antimatter for propulsion and other purposes has the virtue that annihilation releases the maximum possible energy from the "fuel" particles (the full E=mc^2). But there are enormous technical challenges to doing anything useful with antimatter ranging from storing the antimatter to harnessing the energy released (which tends to come in the form of gamma rays of inconveniently high energy, sprayed in completely random directions).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's the tracks from all the particles thrown off in the annihilation.
When a particle and an anti-particle "annihilate", they don't
necessarily just blink out of existence. Instead, they may
throw off a bunch of debris.

Some of the particles are neutral, some have a positive electric
charge, and some have a negative electrical charge. Passing
through a magnetic field, charged particles whirl around, one
way for positively-charged particles, the other way way for
negatively-charged particles, and straight for neutral particles.

So what you have here is the recording of one particular collision.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. We're doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. I picture the Earth asking...
Does this belt make my butt look big?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sailing Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh great! Now they're are going to build a Doomsday Machine
Capt Kirk: "Did you run a scanner check. What kind of a force beam?"

Cmdr Decker: "Pure anti-proton. Absolutely Pure!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I believe Decker was a commodore, not a commander.
Cmdr is abbreviation for commander. Cdre is for commodore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC