Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The volcanic plume beneath Yellowstone is larger than previously thought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:11 AM
Original message
The volcanic plume beneath Yellowstone is larger than previously thought
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 09:12 AM by n2doc
By John Roach

The volcanic plume beneath Yellowstone is larger than previously thought, according to a new study that measured the electrical conductivity of the hot and partly molten rock.

The findings say nothing about the chances of another cataclysmic eruption at Yellowstone, but they give scientists another view of the vast and deep reservoir that feeds such eruptions.

"It's a totally new and different way of imaging and looking at the volcanic roots of Yellowstone," study co-author Robert Smith, an emeritus professor of geophysics at the University of Utah, said in a press release.

more

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/11/6452336-supervolcano-plume-sized-up



This image, based on variations in electrical conductivity of underground rock, shows the volcanic plume of partly molten rock that feeds the Yellowstone supervolcano. Yellow and red indicate higher conductivity, green and blue indicate lower conductivity. Made by University of Utah geophysicists and computer scientists, this is the first large-scale "geoelectric" image of the Yellowstone hotspot.

Credit: University of Utah
Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the Yellowstone Caldera ever erupts, life in the U.S. would be changed as we know it /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Changed, or 'largely eradicated'?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. People will survive /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. In the US? Try on planet earth...
..large portions of the US would become uninhabitable..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I would think it would be an extinction level event
*life* might survive, but I doubt the human race would. We're the dinosaur equivalent now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I dont think so
it might kill 100s of millions, heck it might even kill billions, but extinction level? I just don't see it. Enough folks would survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Planet. Life on the entire planet would be changed as we know it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. so the question is, which gets us first--yellowstone or the repukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Without question the repukes, unless of course the Democrats start to fight /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am not holding my breath for that possibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mn9driver Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's overdue for an eruption.
Could happen any time in the next 50,000 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. I admit I was sort of hoping for "smaller"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC