Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Weight of Evidence: It's Still Unhealthy to be Fat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:24 PM
Original message
Weight of Evidence: It's Still Unhealthy to be Fat

Weight of Evidence: It's Still Unhealthy to be Fat


"It undoubtedly sounded like good news to many Americans: "Some Extra Heft May Be Helpful," blared a New York Times headline two weeks ago, reporting on a study from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The report claimed that the current measurement for "overweight" is actually the healthiest level, while the "healthy weight" category is relatively unhealthy. Moreover the NCHS estimated that annual U.S. deaths from being overweight or obese are much lower than previously thought – 25,814 per year, as opposed to the CDC estimate of 365,000 deaths per year from "poor diet and physical inactivity," most of which are related to weight.

Smug commentators went wild: The "fatophobes," wrote John Tierney in a triumphant New York Times column, "are fighting on, disputing the new study and arguing that it still shows the fatal dangers of being seriously obese. But they have lost the scientific high ground." Meanwhile the nation's preeminent calorie pusher – the Center for Consumer Freedom, a front group for the food and beverage industry – practically gloated itself to death with an obese $600,000 newspaper advertising blitz.

But is it true that "Americans have been force-fed a steady diet of obesity myths" by the CDC and others, as the Center for Consumer Freedom claimed in its full-page ads? And will that spare tire around your waist actually help you get more mileage out of life? There's good reason to believe that the answer to both questions is no.

To determine fatness, the CDC uses a measure called Body Mass Index (BMI), a comparison of weight to height. According to the CDC, a BMI of 25 to 30 is "overweight" and unhealthy while a BMI above 30 is "obese" and extremely unhealthy. The new study, published by Katherine Flegal and colleagues in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), found that the 25-to-30 category was the healthiest, and that it isn't until the 35-plus BMI category that a serious risk of premature death kicks in. CDC Director Julie Gerberding has said that her agency will not adjust its own numbers to reflect the new findings, and it's easy to see why. The new study contradicts a slew of previous epidemiological studies, including the six different studies the CDC used to arrive at its estimates.

..."


http://www.fumento.com/fat/obesitymay2005.html

and...

https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=w050502&s=fumento050305



----------



Alas, this story is a perfect example of the piss-poor health coverage offered by the MSM. One study does not allow for the dismissal of all the evidence that came before it, yet one would think that everything we thought we knew had changed based on the coverage this story received.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's unhealthy to be unhealthy
The focus should be on health - if you don't have an eating disorder, if you live a healthy life style, if you're active and your sugar, cholesteral, BP and other factors are healthy - on a wholistic level it's much better to not stress out about a "spare tire"

If you can't get out of bed because you're body can't support your weight, that's a different story.

And to characterize Tierney as smug only betrays a bias in the author of this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So it's always bias to point out bias?
Tierney messed up. He fell for the trap of throwing out all the research that came before in order to push the latest as the be all, end all. That's a terrible sort of bias. I'm sorry, but pointing that out is simply do one's job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Delusional thinking affects all sectors
Common sense tells us that being overweight is bad for your health. Studies are not needed. Excess weight stresses all body systems with the end result being a reduction in quality of life and lifespan. Some people dodge the bullet, just like the three-pack-a-day smoker who lives to be 90 and doesn't even have a cough.

Affected groups seek excuses and try to rationalize the problem away.

People are not meant to be overweight. We are animals. When was the last time you saw an overweight wild animal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't need "experts" to tell me this sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. A private obsession, don't worry about it.
Edited on Thu May-12-05 04:18 PM by bemildred
I was merely pointing that these fellows are belaboring the obvious.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC