Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is psychology a science?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:13 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is psychology a science?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it is.
Psychiatry, now, that's another story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Fields arranged by purity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ratty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. It meets all the criteria
Observation, theory, testability, reproducibility. It produces excellent predictive models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Sarcasm, surely
As far as I know, it has quite thoroughly failed all these tests for the past 100 years.

We still have no theories as to why our popular mood-altering chemicals do what they do. Drugs that nominally affect the same receptor system in the same way have radically differing effect from each other.

Its a social science, which is to say it's part of the mechanism of social control. It's about as much a science as terrorism is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Lol here's a list of most of the disciplines of psychology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_psychology_disciplines

If you'd studied neuropharmacology you wouldn't have made that statement about psychoactive drugs. I hope you enjoy the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's an anagram of SLY COPY HOG
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can be.
Sometimes it's vague musings on a vast set of observations. What you get out is basically what you look for.

Sometimes you control the situation so that you're examining a single behavior in a single context that can be varied, and you run the experiment enough to get statistically valid conclusions.

So I've done eye-tracking to monitor real-time processing of reflexive pronouns. You have specially constructed and vetted stimuli, you know the timing of hearing and processing to within a few ms. You get results, and it's science.

"Psychology" is too big a tent to yield a single answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Anyone who's studied it can see that it is.
It includes some neuroanatomy, statistics, sociology, and who knows what else. Even from my single course, I can see that. Who says it's not a science?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. My wife and I have a running joke in our household in which
sociology, and sometimes psychology, are referred to as liberal arts.

We are both college students, so such jokes are hilarious to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. It depends on how you define "science".
Edited on Sat Jun-26-10 09:44 AM by Avalux
If science = truths observed and tested through scientific methods, then it's a gray area and some would say no. Psychology is subjective in many ways; doesn't always produce physical evidence which can be measured and reproduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Go take a modern psych course in any one of the branches
It's unfortunate that the self help section of airport bookstores is where many people draw their opinion of the science of psychology from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. What do you think of the following Democratic Underground thread?
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 03:27 PM by Boojatta
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Soros probably doesn't know the first thing about the sciences
George Soros (Hungarian: Soros György) (pronounced /ˈsɔroʊs/ or /ˈsɔrəs/,<3>; Hungarian IPA: <ˈʃoroʃ>; born August 12, 1930, as Schwartz György) is a Hungarian-American currency speculator, stock investor, businessman, philanthropist, and liberal political activist.<4> He became known as "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England" after he made a reported $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis.<5><6>

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

Expertise in one field is not generalizable to others. In the quotes you offered he eloquently stated internally consistent opinions, but as another poster pointed out - these are opinions. I would like to see the studies that he bases these opinions on. I would love to see how he applied the scientific method in a reliable way to hold up the broad brush with which he paints all social sciences as unscientific :P

Psychology spans the full spectrum of scientific investigation: ranging at one end from surveys and environmental observation (much like sociology), to the other end of decoding the electrical and chemical impulses of neural networks using physics, organic chemistry, anatomy, etc, and direct manipulation. Psychology has allowed millions of otherwise disabled people to live somewhat to fully self-sufficient and fulfilling lives, and is even now helping paralyzed people to walk, people who were thought to be brain dead talk, people who are blind to see. Anyone who broad-brushes psychology as a soft-science only demonstrates that they don't know what they're talking about.

Psychology is the study of the mind. The CNS happens to be the most complicated machine on the planet, and while our study of it is imperfect, to deny that much measurable progress has been made (through generations of scientific rigor) is just plain silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I deal with psychologists and pyschiatrists all of the time
as an attorney and let me tell, while the overall areas may fit the definition of science, the practitioners are all over the map.

You can always find one doc to say person X is really mentally ill and another to say he's just fine and dandy. I also find that never have I seen a scientific discipline so dependent on the personal bias and beliefs of the individuals involved. You can have conservative and liberal psychologists and psychiatrists.

It's a soft science like sociology. Not made up, has scientific underpinnings, but a lot of loosey-goosey things going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. If it can't be expressed in numbers, it's not science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. I dated a woman in college who was really good at gelato.
Incidentally, she was a psych major, and she laughed at efforts to characterize psychology as a science.

Don't know whether she was right or wrong in that regard, but there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kick to encourage more votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC