Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 scientific objects that changed the world

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:49 PM
Original message
10 scientific objects that changed the world
To mark its centenary, the Science Museum in London had its curators select the ten objects in its collection that made the biggest mark on history. Explore them in this gallery, and cast your vote in the public poll to decide the most significant of all.



Thompson’s Atmospheric Engine

Thompson's was the first truly practical steam engine.

The atmospheric engine, first invented in 1712, solved the energy crisis of its day and heralded the start of the Industrial Revolution.

The engine unlocked previously unreachable coal reserves, by pumping water from deep mines.

Although this triumph of engineering arguably marks the start of the industrial age we still inhabit, it also marks the point that our dependence on fossil fuels really began.

more:

http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/dn17273-ten-most-historic-science-objects
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momto3 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very cool.
As a biologist, I cannot fathom a time without the knowledge of the DNA double helix. The knowledge that DNA carries a genetic code that is passed on to our offspring totally revolutionized the entire biological field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not particularly scientific, are they?
I'd argue that the model-T and the 0-2-2 were more feats of economics and marketing rather than science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC