Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan researchers film live giant squid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Japan researchers film live giant squid
(snip)
TOKYO --A Japanese research team has succeeded in filming a giant squid live -- possibly for the first time -- and says the elusive creatures may be more plentiful than previously believed, a researcher said Friday.

The research team, led by Tsunemi Kubodera, videotaped the giant squid at the surface as they captured it off the Ogasawara Islands south of Tokyo earlier this month. The squid, which measured about 24-feet long, died while it was being caught.

"We believe this is the first time anyone has successfully filmed a giant squid that was alive," said Kubodera, a researcher with Japan's National Science Museum. "Now that we know where to find them, we think we can be more successful at studying them in the future."

Giant squid, formally called Architeuthis, are the world's largest invertebrates. Because they live in the depths of the ocean, they have long been wrapped in mystery and embellished in the folklore of sea monsters, appearing in ancient Greek myths or attacking the submarine in Jules Verne's "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea."
(snip)

http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/12/22/japan_researchers_film_live_giant_squid/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News

That's disappointing to say the least that the animal died. But I still I must admit since it exists would be very interested in seeing this video.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not the first
I saw the actual first time on film over a year ago on the discovery channel. But this one was alive and in its natural habitat, not being dragged to the surface to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clearly it's time to fire up the hunting ships
A 6 inch sliver of organ will be deemed to have aphrodesiac qualities, so 50 foot squid will be pulled out the ocean, have it removed, and tossed back in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Destroy the Village to Save it!!!???
"the elusive creatures may be more plentiful than previously believed"

I would say they are less plentiful now...by about one!

I know, I know, there's the argument you have to kill them to study them. I just don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. God forbid idiots in Asia believe it can make their little dicks 1/4" longer
or harder for 30 seconds, they will be wiped off the face of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wrong. Not the first
Disney filmed a live Giant Squid in 1954 for its film 20000 Legos under the Sea :crazy:

:eyes:

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. so they just HAD to catch it?
there have been other architeuthis carcases --

why not film it and leave it alone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They probably wanted to eat it to see if it was tastey as a whale.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. They're not good to eat.
Their flesh contains Ammonia. No problem with them being overfished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Doesn't usually stop them ...
Remember, these are people who deliberately eat very poisonous fish
just to gamble that they can afford chefs that leave out the nasty bit ...

Their next argument will be "They are killing too many fish so we will have to cull them".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC