Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Space Shuttle Launch Pushed Back to July

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 05:32 PM
Original message
Space Shuttle Launch Pushed Back to July
By MIKE SCHNEIDER, Associated Press Writer
14 minutes ago

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - NASA on Tuesday pushed back the launch of space shuttle Discovery from May until at least July because of a faulty fuel tank sensor.

A similar problem briefly delayed last summer's launch of Discovery on the first shuttle flight since the Columbia disaster in 2003.

NASA said it needs the time to open up the spacecraft's hydrogen fuel tank and replace the sensor, which gave an electrical current reading that was slightly off. The space agency plans to replace the three other sensors in the tank, too, to be safe.

The fuel gauges are designed to prevent the main engines from running too long or not long enough, during the climb to space. An engine shutdown at the wrong time could prove catastrophic, forcing the astronauts to attempt a risky emergency landing overseas, or leading to a ruptured engine.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060314/ap_on_sc/space_shuttle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's time to retire the shuttle and develop a new vehicle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amen...
They need to find a cheaper and safer way to get into orbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed...
Preferable one that doesn't require you to jettison most of the mass before reaching orbit, yet is powerful enough to hit Geosynchronous orbit. You know that most of the problems associated with the shuttle, including safety, are because it is OVERLY complicated, as far as design goes. A slightly simpler design can go a long way, plus the shuttle has had a pretty good safety record, but improve upon and replace it, with a slightly less expensive and simpler design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC