Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bill of Rights, not the Ten Commandments, should be on our buildings.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 12:01 AM
Original message
The Bill of Rights, not the Ten Commandments, should be on our buildings.
I just read a Columbus Free Press article by Harvey Wasserman entitled The Fundamentalist attack on separation of church & state defames America and its founders. It is well worth reading. I have included a snip here. Click the article title link above to read the rest.

The right-wing's multi-front war on American democracy now aims at our core belief in separation of church and state. It includes an attempt to say the founding fathers endorsed the idea that this is a "Christian nation," with an official religion.

But the founders---and a vast majority of Americans---repeatedly, vehemently and with stunning clarity denounced, rejected and despised such beliefs.

Nowhere in the Constitution they wrote does the word "Christian" or the name of Christ appear. The very first phrase of the First Amendment demands that "Congress shall make no law concerning an establishment of religion."

snip

It is not the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments that form the bedrock of American values. It is the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution. If anything should be chiseled in stone on our public buildings, it's the Bill of Rights.

Which is precisely what this attack on our history means to burn at the stake. Awakened America rose up in revolt against King, corporation and clergy. Its rejection of a state-sponsored church, Christian or otherwise, was fiercely explicit and decidedly mainstream.

Today's corporate-funded fundamentalist jihad is at war with America's uniquely diverse revolutionary soul. Spitting in the face of our historic core, the Big Lie of a "Christian nation" is vintage Rove at his most Orwellian.


Check it out. It's too good not to share! :hi:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the founding fathers wanted the 10 commandments
as part of the Constitution, they would have made it part of the Constitution. They didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you, it is too good not to share.
*****
Then comes the astonishing assertion that the incomparably urbane, tolerant and ever-eclectic Benjamin Franklin was somehow a Christian soldier. Never mind that in his Autobiography the Puritan-born Franklin, with his usual wry wit, laments having been dragged by a friend to church, from which he fled back to his books and experiments.

Never mind also that the legendary atheism of the wildly popular Tom Paine and Ethan Allen was embraced throughout a new nation that loved rational reason.
*****
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good idea. Other choices for northern sensible states,
would be

french rationalists' Rights of Man

UN 's Human Rights which we signed to, and are "the supreme law of the land" for signatories, according to our Constitution about all treaties.
UN 's HR says all will "promote total employment".. so you have a right to a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Also too good not to share, just the preamble alone is inspiring:
*****
PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
*****

http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Wrong
Paine and Allen were Deists. Check out Age of Reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Tell it to Harvey Wasserman.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
moose65 Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. What a great idea!
I've often wondered if these people who want the 10 Commandments in the courtroom have actually READ the 10 Commandments. As far as I can tell, only 2 of the commandments deal with something that is actually a crime in the US: Don't steal and don't kill. All the others are purely religious (adultery may still be illegal in some states, but it's never enforced, and it's not a crime to lie unless you're under oath). Do these people really want those ancient laws as part of our legal code? How many "good Christians" would be criminals if it was against the law to work on Sunday, take the Lord's name in vain, or make images or icons? And how many of them even know what "covet" means?? Arrggghhhhhh!! The 10 Commandments flap is just a blatant way to inject religion into government, to equate religious law with secular law. Let's start a "Post the Bill of Rights" movement!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That and
It undermines Christianity which is supposed to follow Jesus. Fundie Christianity is just Messianic Judaism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. In addition, the 10 commandments was not the beginning of ethics/law
Code of Hammurabi was written about 1786 BC

Hebrew Law or 10 commandments about 1505 BC

According to the NIV Bible the Exodus of the Israelites from Egyptian bondage occurred 1446 BC.

Why did god provide his law after the Code of Hammurabi? Why are there so many similarities? Why didn't god provide his law in the beginning of time?

Who served as priests before Levi and his family? Did they have priests before the Exodus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
highlonesome Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another -- forgotten -- side of it
The Founders ran the gamut of religious belief and for many of those who were devout believers in Christianity, they wanted separation to protect their religion from the coercive influence of government as much as others wanted their government protected from religion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Back then and for a short time after...
they had to pay a church tax that paid the salaries of ministers belonging to the approved state church. In addition, anyone not attending church could be fined. If they didn't belong to the state church they could not be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC