I have noticed recently that some political writers have started using the term Christian Nationalist to describe conservative christians in the Republican party. I think I like this term as it more accurately describes who this people are and what there aims are. It also harkens to the rise of the Nazis in 1930's Germany without using the word Nazi. Which really does more harm than good in that it tends to alienate people and you loose them in the discussion.
(snip)
I think that he makes a good point. It certainly does appear as though Bush's attitude is that the American military is doing the Will of God - and insofar as the troops are victorious, God is victorious. At the same time, when I see it expressed in the manner that Bush does in his letter, I'm struck by the fact that it doesn't look so odd in this phrasing. But why is that?
It can't be because I agree that America is doing God's Will! Is it because I've spent too much time reading stuff written by Christian Nationalists? Perhaps. But there is another explanation: it may be that Bush is expressing an idea that is so widespread and common that it wouldn't normally arouse interest or comment. Maybe it doesn't look so odd to me because I've seen similar sentiments expressed so often before - expressed not as a part of a conscious agenda but rather just as a reflexive, automatic action.
I'm not quite sure if I should be bothered by that or not. Maybe I shouldn't be - maybe this is a sign that people don't think much about such statements and also don't mean much by them. Then again, maybe I should be bothered because it's a sign of just how common such beliefs are and how fertile the ground may be for a more conscious and deliberate form of Christian Nationalism. I don't want to be paranoid, but I also don't want to ignore possible problems, either.
(con't)
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/053182.htm