Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the Deal with Michael Jackson....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
firebee Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 12:36 PM
Original message
What's the Deal with Michael Jackson....
Honestly, I don't think the families going after Jackson have a case. I think they're making wild assumptions because Jackson is extremely eccentric. These people see him change his appearance and they see the way he loves to be around children and act like a child, so they assume he's a nutcase child mollester.

While this family's assumption has some validity because Jackson is eccentric and he is a nutcase, I think a good number of people don't understand Jackson. Jackson never had a childhood. His childhood was lost to the music industry. As a result, Michael Jackson developed a "Peter Pan" complex. Since he never had a childhood, he embraced the premise of "Peter Pan" and chose to retake his childhood later in life. This "Peter Pan" complex is the reason he looks like a disney character. He's trying to, literally, turn himself into Peter Pan. You can see it in his complexion and the plastic surgery he's gone through. You can see it in the name of his ranch, "Never Never Land".

Why is Jackson really getting drug through the mud? Well... If Jackson wasn't being smeared by the media right now, what kind of political impact could he make and who would he be? Short of this child molestation campaign and his freaky appearance, Michael Jackson is virtually unscathed by inpurity. If Jackson didn't have his reputation smeared in the media, he'd be the ultimate anti-war and anti-Bush figure. How much would Jackson's representation threaten the agenda of this administration if Jackson never got implicated in this child molestation scandal.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
is this for real? "Michael Jackson is virtually unscathed by inpurity(sic)"?

Hardly. His last victim settled for 20 million dollars.

Jackson was never political, so I doubt this is an attempt to silence a leading peace activist. If you've read the depositions on www.smokinggun.com, it appears that Jackson has a fondness for diddling young boys. There is enough evidence for a Grand Jury to have charged him with a crime. The trial will decide his guilt or innocence, but I suggest he start preparing himself for a long prison stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ynksnewyork2 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jackson's been sleeping with young boys
WAY before the Bush administration ever existed. He was paying multimillion dollar hush money in the early 1990's!! He's brought this on himself and it's about time a jury decides what justice will be for Mr Jackson. But, like Dookus said, I think Michael's probably planning how he'll live the next ten or twenty years without his make up or his prosthetic nose!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
freetheworkers Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Reply to: Jackson's been sleeping with young boys
I think this is a shakedown. I do not believe the stories. I think these people tried to hold Jackson up and since times are not that flush for him now he couldn't meet their demands.

I would assume Jackson threatened to press charges for extortion, and to press charges the other way was the response. In other words, the best defense is a good offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ynksnewyork2 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. We'll see
Won't we?? No matter what the verdict, his reputation is damaged beyond repair. Anyone want to toast with a little Jesus Juice??
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
firebee Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Early 1990's???
Wasn't that about the same time Daddy Bush waged war against Iraq??? Tell me why Jackson seemed to stay clean of these scandals throughout the nineties. BTW... That case in the early 90's was so bullcrap and you should know that. Don't you remember the recording of the victim's dad's conversation on the phone during that trial? The only thing he talked about was how much money he wanted to get. That case was so obviously a money grab, that it was sickening.

As for this case... I'm just not sure. I think some people see Jackson as an easy target because of his eccentricity and decide to take advantage of it. Essentially... I'll bet money Jackson isn't gound guilty of this and I'll bet money that the civil case is settled out of court. Why??? Because this is obviously just another person looking to get rich at Jackson's expense.

If Jackson really was a child molester, I'm pretty sure their'd be more than one family pressing charges in the early nineties and one family pressing charges a decade later. As our catholic priests have shown us.... This kind of sickness doesn't limit itself to a child once every decade. If Jackson was a Chimo, their'd be a number of people coming out and speaking about their experience right now, but you don't see that... do you?

It's alright.... I'll be back to say "I told you so" in due time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jackson is wasting money on PR shills and fake fans
His story just gets sadder and sadder. If he wasn't rich and famous he would be in prison long, long ago and certainly people wouldn't take their children to his house like lambs to a slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ucmike Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. give this case the respect it deserves
and never pay attention to it again. no news articles, no tv segments, no web polls...NOTHING!!!! ignore this non-news fiasco.

p.s. jackson will flee the u.s. before he ever sees any punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I agree with your last part
I've said for a long time Jackson will simply flee and never return. He won't actually go to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. If the steps to prove molestation...
... are one through ten, Jackson's own public admissions put the state's case at maybe 8. Keep in mind that there is a disconnect between what the star-dazzled media is reporting and what the D.A. has in its trial notebook. I don't doubt that Jackson has psychological problems. Unfortunately for him, they are not a defense and may end up adding to the circumstantial case against him.

There is certainly a disconnect between the defense strategy and reality. If I was his defense lawyer, I would direct him to get a crew-cut, get rid of the make-up and get a pair of slacks, a white shirt, a solid tie and a fuzzy sweater from Pennys to wear to court. I would tell the jury that his bizzare public appearance is just an act and that this more normal looking dude (except for the nose) is the real guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. that can't be answered in the time & space available here...
truly
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC