Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals court dismisses (Portland Archdiocese) sex abuse suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:01 PM
Original message
Appeals court dismisses (Portland Archdiocese) sex abuse suit
Mount Angel - The ruling says in one claim a priest's authority was not invoked

The Portland Archdiocese won a rare legal victory Wednesday when the Oregon Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit against two priests accused of sexually abusing a boy in the 1950s.

The suit named the Rev. Clement Frank and the Rev. Louis Charvet, Mount Angel Abbey priests who are now dead.

The plaintiff claimed that after he fell down while roller-skating in Mount Angel in the early 1950s Frank happened to walk up, took him to a church and sexually assaulted him. The Court of Appeals ruled that the church cannot be held responsible because Frank did not use his position as a priest to gain access to the boy.

The plaintiff said that in 1958 Charvet sexually touched himself in his presence.

The court ruled that such conduct was not child abuse. So the extended statute of limitations under child abuse law did not apply and the plaintiff waited too long to file his suit.

Oregonian
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is he Decision, if anyone wants to read it instead of the Newspaper Article.
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 07:06 PM by happyslug
http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A124850.htm

Please note this was an Appeal from the Trial Court Decision to dismiss the case, thus the standard of Review assumes all facts in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Catholic Church. The Court ruled even if the Plaintiff could prove all of the facts of the case in Plaintiff's favor, Plaintiff would still lose. Thus the language in the above article, it reflects this standard of review, assuming everything alleged to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC