Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This C-section trend is beginning to get out of hand.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:05 AM
Original message
This C-section trend is beginning to get out of hand.

Doctors Perform C-Section and Find No Baby



Two North Carolina doctors have been reprimanded for performing a caesarian on a woman, only to discover she wasn't pregnant at all.

Doctors opened up the woman and found a nonpregnant uterus. The incident -- a rare case of pseudocyesis or a false or hysterical pregnancy -- happened at the Cape Fear Medical Center in Fayetteville, N.C.

The woman reportedly appeared at the hospital with her husband asking for a C-section. A resident in charge made the pregnancy diagnosis and doctors agreed to surgery after trying to induce labor for two days.

Neither doctor independently confirmed the pregnancy.

In January, after studying the case for more than a year, the North Carolina Medical Board sent "letters of concern," the lowest level of discipline, to Dr. Gerianne Geszler, who was the on-call physician, and Dr. Dorrette Grant, who performed the caesarian in 2008.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ReproductiveHealth/pregnant-mother-section-doctors-find-baby/story?id=10262881

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. No ultrasound?
There is going to be a series of fine lawsuits over this one. I wish I could have been a fly on the wall for that hospital's M&M.

Munchhausen's Syndrome is well enough known that anyone should have confirmed the patient's condition, as well as gestational age to ensure fetal survival. You can't just waltz into a hospital and demand to be cut open and have it done.

This is an astonishing case on a lot of levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or what about fetal monitors that would have shown no fetal heartbeat?
It's astounding that with all of the technology available today for use during labor and childbirth that none were able to detect that the woman was not pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or just a STETHOSCOPE
You don't need fancy equipment to find out if there's a baby in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. All the fancy technology in the world won't tell you if someone's pregnant unless you use it.
They weren't able to detect that she wasn't pregnant because they didn't check. They just followed the typical 'cut her open and sort it out later' process that is partially responsible for the out of control C-section rates in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Uh, apparently you can.
<You can't just waltz into a hospital and demand to be cut open and have it done.>

Dr. Douche! Dr. Douche! Calling Dr. Douche! You're needed in the Malpractice Wing stat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. OMG
you're good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Neither doctor independently confirmed the pregnancy. " Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. One of my sheep had to have a c-section performed
and I was appalled at what a major operation it was. Now granted it was performed by a vet student at the teaching hospital and so it probably went more slowly than usual. But still, three layers of muscle had to be cut and then the uterus itself. Then everything cleaned up and then sewn back up. It took hours and I just cannot believe that over 30% of US births are now via c-section.

It is one thing to hear about it and another to see it. I am still a bit shocked by it all.

FYI the lamb had died, we could not get it out and so to save the ewe I brought her to the vet school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even if the doctors could be forgiven for assuming the woman was pregnant
There is NO excuse for not confirming the viability of the (non) infant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. maybe the dingo
ate her baby

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC