Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Masturbation May Increase Risk of Prostate Cancer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:28 PM
Original message
Masturbation May Increase Risk of Prostate Cancer
By LiveScience Staff
posted: 26 January 2009 12:27 pm ET

A new study finds men who are sexually active in their 20s and 30s are more likely to develop prostate cancer — especially if they masturbate frequently.

The message, perhaps: Hold off until middle age.

The study also found that frequent sexual activity in a man's 40s appears to have little effect and even small levels of sexual activity in a man's 50s could offer protection from the disease. Most of the differences were attributed to masturbation rather than sexual intercourse.

The study, led by the University of Nottingham, looked at the sexual practices of more than 431 men who had been diagnosed with prostate cancer before the age of 60, together with 409 controls who do not have prostate cancer.

Among men with prostate cancer, 34 percent had masturbated frequently in their 20s, compared to 24 percent among the control group. A similar spread was found for men in their 30s.

The results, based on questionnaires, are detailed in the journal BJU International (the British Journal of Urology).

more:

http://www.livescience.com/health/090126-masturbation-prostate.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. There has to be another reason.
Whacking off causing cancer? That old wive's tale about it falling off can't be true! Can it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. or going blind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Just do it til you need glasses.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where did they get the control group..
of people who don't masturbate frequently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Maybe it is really "liars get less Prostrate Cancer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The control group is lying. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. now that's comedy! great line! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, good grief.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 06:32 PM by Hissyspit
What completely useless information.

A difference between 34 and 24 percent?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is absolute bullshit. Who sponsored this study, Rick Warren?
Or perhaps it was Jerry Falwell's group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm doomed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am dead


So what do I have to do now? Please have sex with me if you don't want me to get cancer?

So if you had lots of sex you will get cancer .... if you didn't have a partner but instead
buffed the pole you will get cancer .... so no sex and no wanking and you do not get cancer?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. If the study in the OP were true, I would surely have been dead by now.
On the other "hand":
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3072021.stm
"Masturbation 'cuts cancer risk'"

Sorry for the jokes, but they write themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw07 Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Damn. You beat me (pun intended) to the punch line. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Without having read the article--
did they test for HPV or other viruses? Were the frequent wankers any more likely to smoke, drink, eat red meat, etc.? I'll betcha higher libido leads to more risk-taking across the board, and that's your link. If there's any link at all, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. or where they jacking it so much because they couldn't get laid?
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 06:45 PM by progdonkey
Maybe they were fat, drug-addicted or just all-around unhealthy in their 20s and could never get laid, so they spent more time masturbating than someone who had a regular partner. Or maybe the guys had larger than average penises, so they enjoyed masturbating more often, and it's actually having the larger penis that results in the higher incidence of prostate cancer for some reason

Or, you know, it's just all bullshit and very poorly designed study, which is often more likely in these sort of salacious reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. I thought that masturbation was good for the prostate
Oh, well. Too late now. My prostate is either super-healthy or about to disintegrate.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Come on.... Find those docs or analysts something else to do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldnslo Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yet another medical study gets its name in the paper....yawn......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Think of all the sperm that will be saved!! Hooray, creationism,
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 07:46 PM by HysteryDiagnosis
life, self flagellation, saying confession to a child molester, tithing and all the other glitter!!


Eat enough cruciferous vegetables and forget about it.

: In Vivo. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):441-5.Links
Review. Indole-3-carbinol as a chemoprotective agent in breast and prostate cancer.
Bradlow HL.

David and Alice Jurist Institute for Medical Research, Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA. bradlowhl@gmail.com

Assessment of the oral use of indole-3-carbinol (I3C) as a chemoprotective compound has not sufficiently considered the chemical instability of I3C. This review addresses the question of whether I3C is directly active in its own right or only serves as a precursor, with all of the biological responses coming from reaction products arising in culture media and in the presence of stomach acid. Because of the rapid conversion of I3C into its dimer. diindolylmethane (DIM), and trimers very little circulating I3C is present following oral use to effect a biological response. Reports of toxicity associated with oral use of I3C relate to unfavorable enzyme induction, which can be attributed to non-DIM reaction products. Because DIM provides a predictable, safer response than the mélange of compounds derived from I3C DIM should be regarded as the chemoprotective compound of choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Reminds me of Robin Williams Stand Up Act
"(Knock, knock, knock)....Robin what are you doing in there?"



"Going Blind!!!!!!!!"




B-)






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Right, telling a 20 something "Hold off until middle age" might make women happier, but I doubt many
could or would.


Oh, you mean don't "masturbate". Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm screwed.
Ha! I kill me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. No, you're not screwed.
If you had been screwed, you wouldn't be jerkin off all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Zing!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Knock it off!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ironically masturbation was prescribed
to help lower the PSA of a friend. The prescribed treatment was successful.........lol.

Make what you will of that especially if you're 65 years old as is he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. yeah -- like that will ever happen.
what twenty something doesn't jerk off frequently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. Glad I have good life insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
29. Dueling studies: Masturbation 'cuts cancer risk'
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 05:53 AM by NickB79
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3072021.stm

"Men could reduce their risk of developing prostate cancer through regular masturbation, researchers suggest.

They say cancer-causing chemicals could build up in the prostate if men do not ejaculate regularly.

And they say sexual intercourse may not have the same protective effect because of the possibility of contracting a sexually transmitted infection, which could increase men's cancer risk.

Australian researchers questioned over 1,000 men who had developed prostate cancer and 1,250 who had not about their sexual habits. "


These researchers need to get their story straight. I don't know if I'm coming or going :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC