Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meat does increase Cancer risk - Fruit/veggies don't decrease the risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:09 AM
Original message
Meat does increase Cancer risk - Fruit/veggies don't decrease the risk
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 11:09 AM by papau
I do like Eugenia Calle's ( senior author of the paper and director of analytic epidemiology at the American Cancer Society ) work - but some of us can't eat nuts and some beans due to gout!

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-food12jan12,1,3643830.story
THE NATION
Cancer Study Re-Indicts Red, Processed Meats
Colorectal malignancies rose by up to 50% among a high-consumption group. Benefits of fruits, vegetables downgraded.
By Rosie Mestel
Times Staff Writer

January 12, 2005

Adding weight to earlier findings, a study of nearly 150,000 adults has found that eating too many red and processed meats raises a person's risk for colorectal cancer by up to 50%.

Meanwhile, another study of 285,526 European women has found that eating lots of fruits and vegetables does not lower a woman's risk for breast cancer, refuting some earlier studies.

Experts said that both studies were large and carefully conducted and thus important in better defining the often murky relationship between cancer and people's eating habits — with implications for consumers.

The study on meat and cancer, published today in the Journal of the American Medical Assn., was conducted by Ann Chao of the American Cancer Society and colleagues using data from 148,610 men and women aged 50 to 74 in 21 states.

The scientists found that the group that ate the most red meat over the long term (defined as an average of at least three ounces daily for men and two ounces for women) had a 30% to 40% increased risk of rectal cancer or cancer of the distal colon (the portion of the colon nearest the rectum) compared to those whose consumption was lowest (less than 1.5 ounces daily for men, and one ounce for women.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. So it's just red meat?
Poultry and pork OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. no, I think it includes poultry
I just heard a program on it on our local public radio and the spokesperson said there are carcinogens that come about when poultry is cooked.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is very iimportant information,
which should get more exposure. I read a while back that the American Cancer Society knows full well that eating meat is linked with cancer. They've known about it for years, but they're afraid of coming out and saying it, because of the Cattle Industry.

Politics again trumps safety concerns. Well, I'm glad they're finally coming out and saying it.

It's also the reason why I don't eat meat. Said good-bye to it about 10 years ago.....will never go back.

I just read about the Mad Cow issues now, but it doesn't affect me the way it used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dear Maggie Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for sharing
It was also on the news this morning on TV

I find the LA times is a very good source.

They were one of the few that wrote about the Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup workers. Turns out 2-butoxyethanol, in my opinion was more hazardous than the oil for many people then and now

This is there article on that 11-7-01, if you're interested (emphasis mine)
It is considered a classic 'benchmark' article

This chemical exosure can cause heart attacks, too, but it isn't blamed for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC