Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman on our Health system that via Ins Co's tries NOT to provide care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 06:53 PM
Original message
Krugman on our Health system that via Ins Co's tries NOT to provide care
A universal system - Medicare for everyone - NOW! :-)

"Between 2000 and 2005, the number of Americans with private health insurance coverage fell by one percent. But over the same period, employment at health insurance companies rose a remarkable 32 percent. What are all those extra employees doing? Now we know at least part of the answer: they're working harder than ever at identifying people who really need medical care, and ensuring that they don't get it."

Krugman even notes what we have been saying for years at DU - NAMELY, that every other wealthy nation manages to provide almost all its citizens with guaranteed health insurance, while spending less on health care than we do. And there's no mystery why: we're paying the price for pointless, destructive reliance on private insurers. Medicare, which is a universal health insurance program for older Americans, spends less than 2 cents of every dollar on administrative costs, leaving 98 cents to pay for medical care. By contrast, private insurance companies spend only around 80 cents of each dollar in premiums on medical care; much of the remaining 20 cents is spent denying insurance to those who need it.



Insurance Horror Stories
By Paul Krugman
The New York Times

Friday 22 September 2006

"When Steve and Leslie Shaeffer's daughter, Selah, was diagnosed at age 4 with a potentially fatal tumor in her jaw, they figured their health insurance would cover the bulk of her treatment costs." But "shortly after Selah's medical bills hit $20,000, Blue Cross stopped covering them and eventually canceled her coverage retroactively."

So begins a recent report in The Los Angeles Times titled "Sick but Insured? Think Again," which offers a series of similar horror stories, and suggests that these stories represent a growing trend: more and more health insurers are finding ways to yank your insurance when you get sick.

This trend helps explain something that has been puzzling me: why is the health insurance industry growing rapidly, even as it covers fewer Americans?

Between 2000 and 2005, the number of Americans with private health insurance coverage fell by 1 percent. But over the same period, employment at health insurance companies rose a remarkable 32 percent. What are all those extra employees doing?

Now we know at least part of the answer: they're working harder than ever at identifying people who really need medical care, and ensuring that they don't get it. In the past, they mainly concentrated on screening out applicants likely to get sick. Now, it seems, they're also devoting a lot of effort to finding pretexts for revoking insurance after they've already granted it. They typically do this by claiming that they weren't notified about some pre-existing condition, even if the insured wasn't aware of that condition when he or she bought the policy.

Welcome to the ugly world of American health care economics. <snip>




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sick but Insured? Think Again
By Lisa Girion
The Los Angeles Times

Sunday 17 September 2006

Lawsuits accuse insurance companies of retroactively dumping families that rack up large bills. Firms defend their policies, but the state is investigating.
When Steve and Leslie Shaeffer's daughter, Selah, was diagnosed at age 4 with a potentially fatal tumor in her jaw, they figured their health insurance would cover the bulk of her treatment costs.

Instead, almost two years later, the Murrieta, Calif., couple face more than $60,000 in medical bills and fear the loss of their dream home. They struggle to stave off creditors as they try to figure out how Selah can keep seeing the physician they credit with saving her life.

"We're in big trouble," Leslie said.

Shortly after Selah's medical bills hit $20,000, Blue Cross stopped covering them and eventually canceled her coverage retroactively, refusing to pay for treatment, including surgery the insurer had authorized in advance. <SNIP>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Krugman rocks
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 07:07 PM by nam78_two
I am so sad that I can no longer read his columns :(
I don't understand why this issue isn't a bigger deal-its affects upwards of 65% of the population (unless you are in John-Stossel-Happy-fun-candyland).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why not? the wall thing?
There are ways around it...I do a search on some website to see if other bloggers type have posted it somewhere, usually it is up somewhere within a couple of hours...You know what I am talking about?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh really-aha!
yeah...I don't subscribe to Times Select...I can't stand that libertarian hack John Tierney or David Brooks....so I didn't subscribe!
(and ok I don't really have $50 to spare)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I will post the link tomorrow, I have it at my office computer.
You just go type Krugman the article's title/name...and Voila!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nice! Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Love Krugman's work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC