Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California's top court seems split on gay marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:14 PM
Original message
California's top court seems split on gay marriage
Source: Reuters

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The California Supreme Court appeared divided on Tuesday over whether to allow gay marriage during nearly four hours of oral arguments on the contentious issue that could impact gay rights nationwide.

Several of the seven judges asked whether the state legislature might better decide whether matrimony should be limited to a man and a woman, while others pointed to how the same court ended the state ban on marriages between blacks and whites after World War Two.

"I think it's going to be a divided opinion but I wouldn't want to predict who will win," Christopher Krueger, a lawyer representing the state attorney general who presented arguments before the judges, told Reuters.

The hearing brought into focus the highest-profile U.S. fight over gay rights in recent years and the outcome could influence legislation and lawsuits in other states on what has been a hot-button issue in recent election campaigns.

Full Story at this link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080304/us_nm/rights_califo...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. As a Californian, I am saddened that we didn't lead the nation on this issue.
My beloved state was the first to decriminalize homosexuality under the brave leadership of former Governor Jerry Brown in the 1970's.

It saddens me that we were not at the forefront of this, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes the Brown Act
The Willie Brown act. Thanks Jerry and Willie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would be great if we won that
but I am not holding my breath. It would take immense courage for that court to rule for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I am holding my breath because I know that they all know better and what justice requires.
Hey, did you pick a movie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I will submit a list of the pg 13 films
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 08:21 PM by dsc
and let the kids pick. We meet tomorrow. I will let you all know. We do need to get out of the adult ghetto with our movies it is absurd that so many of those films are rated R for little to no reason. On edit, I do hope your court does the right thing but I fear the whole Rose Byrd thing will stick in their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rose Byrd.
What a great woman she was. I'm impressed you know about her. Her final days are heartbreaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. 6 of the 7
justices were appointed by Republican governors. We shall see...

I am not optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moose65 Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hmmmmm......
"Several of the seven judges asked whether the state legislature might better decide whether matrimony should be limited to a man and a woman." WTF...... didn't California's legislature pass a bill to legalize marriage last year, only to have it vetoed by the Governator? Seems like the legislature has already decided. So let's review: the Governator vetoed the bill, saying that the courts should decide, and then the court is divided, saying the legislature should decide? It's a vicious cycle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I noticed that.
Fucking repigs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. There's a rather encouraging story in the NYT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC