by a pediatrician responding to the New York gay marriage decision.
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-zavoski0711.artjul11,0,449874.story?coll=hc-headlines-oped"There is a striking consensus among child health professionals about the well-being of children of same-sex couples: these children score equally as well on measures of health and mental health as do children of heterosexual couples. Few areas of clinical research demonstrate findings as consistently, yet some conservative activists continue to claim that it is their concern about children that leads them to oppose equal marriage rights for gays and lesbians. Concern about children's health is precisely the reason that they should reconsider their opposition.
"As a pediatrician and as president of the Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, I must keep up with current research on children's health. Although legislators and other public officials are not able to do the same, I urge them nonetheless to ensure that child welfare policies are driven by solid information and not shaky ideology.
...
Using specious arguments about children to deny marriage to same-sex couples is not an expression of caring for children; it is quite the opposite. It's a reality that gay men and lesbians have children - they adopt, give birth and provide foster care to children. Their children are part of our world. The question remains: What's best for those children? Prejudice harms children, whether it is socially enacted or enshrined in law. Ending discrimination in marriage laws will endow the children of same-sex couples the same civil rights and protections as their peers. If a stable childhood based upon a loving marriage between two parents is good for children, isn't it good for all children?"