Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homosexual Vs. Gay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:40 PM
Original message
Homosexual Vs. Gay
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 03:41 PM by La Lioness Priyanka
I know some of you are all up in a tizzy, due to this thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=221&topic_id=190416&mesg_id=190416

Just know that there is something about the word homosexual (because it sounds like a scientific word, and possibly a pathology rather than just a descriptive), that the right wing has known for a while, is not as nice sounding or feeling as gay.

http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/30/homosexual-vs-gay-discourse-in-the-culture-wars/

I am not saying people can't say homosexual or that its a pejorative, but there is a reason we tend to say Gay Rights and the right wing says Homosexual Agenda.

Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew they would start fighting each other sooner or later.
I betting on the gay, but what is the over under?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. they = those people
nice

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. The original post
was on the subject of the Guardian which is English. The moral may be to ignore our English media.

Another gem from the Guardian : http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/sep/30/faggots-recipe

You see the actual issue is acceptable terminology in each of our countries - it does differ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. On the other hand, is the term 'heterosexual' acceptable?
It is, after all, the counterpart to the term you find objectionable. If 'heterosexual' is commonly used, then why the attempt to disparage use of 'homosexual?' To me, it's giving power to those who seek to oppress you - not unlike the way RWers attempted to demonize the word 'liberal.' In both cases, I believe that if the word is accurate, describes your personal orientation, and you're proud of who you are, then you are free to take back that word and use it as you see fit.

While on the subject...

Some gays use the 'Q-word' to describe themselves, but I would feel uncomfortable using that word to describe someone's sexual orientation. In light of the countless bigots who have slung that word hatefully, I feel far more comfortable using 'homosexual,' although my 'default' word is still 'gay.' If some are OK with reclaiming that word to describe themselves, I'm certainly in no position to criticize their decision, although I would raise objections if I heard someone use it hatefully. Even if the 'Q-word' becomes acceptable to use in polite company in a descriptive and not a hate-filled way, I don't know that I could say it without worrying about offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Personally,
I don't see the difference being between "gay" and "homosexual", but more between "rights" and "agenda". I don't live it everyday, however, so I may see it differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pejorative or not is depending on the person saying it.
I threw in my own personal point of view of it in the other thread already. I refuse to give the haters the satisfaction of turning a benign word used to describe me into something bad.

I would say, that other than the fly-by trolls that pass through, nobody here would use that word or any other in an intentionally insulting way. I am homosexual, I am gay, and I'm proud of it.

If I say homosexual, it's said with the courtesy and respect it should be spoken in. When Sarah Palin or a right winger says it, there's no doubt that they mean it as a pejorative.

In the other thread, some people used the "c" word as an example (obscenity referring to the female sexual organ). I would not use that word, and even if i used it in an intentionally non insulting way it would still be wrong. However, Margaret Cho throws it into her routine, and it's okay.. funny even.

I've always said it's not the word, but who uses it, when they use it, who their audience is, and the context it is used in is what should determine if it is offensive or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree.
Up until the 70's Homosexuals were all considered abnormal & some to this day still equate Homosexuality to being abnormal.

We define who we are & no one else.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Context means a lot. "That's so gay" is generally pejorative.

"Womanly" is sometimes used as an insult. As of course is "liberal."

I'm all for supporting people by avoiding painful terminology & embracing the positive, but I'm leery of letting hateful people turn otherwise neutral English words into insults for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i dont think homosexual is hurtful. i think one should be wary
that it does sound like a medical/biological diagnosis, which is why, most people dont really use it colloquially. the right wing deliberately uses it, to make it sound weirdly medical
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uriel1972 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I've been called 'Gay' and 'Faggot' far too many times
with too much venom to be comfortable with them. YMMV.
If you prefer gay then by all means use it. I don't judge you by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC