|
Although it won't feel much like it.
(I am an attorney, and in a same gender marriage entered into in Canada)
Marriage is, roughly, a contract between a couple and a state. Absent a divorce (which has occur at the hands of a court), there is nothing another state can do to dissolve the "contract." They claim, however, to not be required to recognize it.
First step is to understand the general concept as it applies to heterosexual couples. Through a pretty complex series of cases the law has worked things out so that when you are married in New York, Texas will recognize that marriage and grant you whatever rights it grants to couples when it is party to the "contract." Federal rights are granted based on state rights. If your marriage was legal in the state in which it was created the US Government recognizes it.
Most of this stuff got worked out when someone who had moved from state to state died, been married more than once without the benefit of divorce, and there was a squabble over who inherited the estate - The thinking went, was he really married to wife #1? After all his marriage to wife #1 (who was a first cousin, who was only 14 at the time of the marriage, who was of a different race, etc. would not have been legal in the state in which he married wife #2 - so wife#2 should be entitled to the estate because there wasn't ever a marriage state#2 would have recognized. Ultimately the states decided they just had to accept (based on constitutional law) that each state gets to decide who is permitted to marry within that state - and by what formalities - and once the marriage is created, every other state has to honor it.
Same thing for marriages created in foreign countries. If you are married in Canada, for example, you are granted marital rights in any state in the US, and by the US Government.
When you look at same gender marriages, the same thing ought to be true - but states and the Federal Government, through a series of marriage discrimination amendments and laws assert that it isn't true. The question as to whether any of those are constitutional hasn't been fully tested yet - but the logic of Loving v. Virginia - the mixed race marriage case which was legal in the state in which the marriage was created, but which Virginia refused to recognize - should apply. Given the current composition of the Supreme Court it isn't clear whether they would follow their own precedent.
So - ignoring the constitutional question - based on the existing statutes and amendments you are still married. Once married, there is no such thing as common law divorce; a marriage has to be undone in court via a divorce or dissolution. A law in Texas can't undo a New York marriage. That said, for now neither Texas nor the Federal government will stand in the shoes of New York and honor the rights that New York has no chosen to make available to you - so it will feel very much like you aren't married when you are in Texas because you won't get any of the rights Texas grants to married couples, even though you are still legally married. You will need to be very careful how you answer questions about your marriage that require any sort of verification as to truth (affidavit, attestation, etc.) Is the request for legal status? Are they asking about recognition by the state/federal government? etc. It is a pain - whenever anyone asks if I am married in any formal context my "short" response is "yes, but neither Ohio nor the Federal government recognize it."
It is ironic that in passing the marriage discrimination amendment that Ohio made me more married than any heterosexual couple in Ohio. Because Ohio doesn't recognize my marriage exists, If my spouse and I were to want to split, one of us would need to move to Canada, Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, New York, Hawaii, Connecticut, New Hampshire, the District of Columbia, or Hawaii in order to obtain a divorce - because the marriage discrimination amendment prohibits state recognition of my marriage - and the state can't terminate what it refuses to acknowledge exists. (Cases on this very issue cropped up pretty soon after the first same gender marriages, when couples moved to states which have laws or amendments similar to Ohio's.)
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
