|
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 02:18 AM by markpkessinger
There are certainly gay people young and old who share this attitude. But I think it is probably more common among younger gay people who have still not come into the full confidence of their adult identity. I suspect this is partly what is going on with the 22 year-old Mr. Hissey. Much as it is with high school students, the issue of what other people think can still, even at 22, be an overriding concern. What they don't yet realize is that, wittingly or not, they are operating under, and are accepting, the premise that bigotry has a rational basis in the first place, and that if only people on the receiving end would do this or would not do that (i.e., act or behave more like what he thinks is normal), the bigots will stop being bigots because they would then "have no reason to" be such.
What people like Mr. Hissey don't understand is that bigotry never requires a rational basis in order to continue. He also may not be aware of some of the cultural history of the gay community in this country prior to the Stonewall riots. In decades prior to the '69 Stonewall riots, one of the major gay organizations in the country was The Mattachine Society. The Mattachine Society's objectives were laudable enough: to try to find ways to make life more tolerable for gays and lesbians in the hopes of one day attaining a measure of tolerance in some quarters of society. Mattachine's philosophy was that if only gay men would "act like normal men" and lesbians would "act like normal women," then gay people wouldn't be perceived as such a threat and would eventually find some degree of acceptance. The key word was "assimilation." Mattachine advised its members to "keep their private lives private," to blend in with straight society, to avoid calling attention to themselves. Unfortunately, as comforting as that might have seemed in theory, if you happened to be having a drink in a gay bar when the police decided to raid, it really didn't matter how discreet you had been or how straight acting you seemed. Your name would be published in the newspapers as having been arrested on "morals" charges, following which people often found themselves fired from their jobs, evicted from their homes and shunned by their families. In short, no amount of conforming to anyone's idea of what constituted "normal" was ever enough to protect people from harassment and persecution.
Finally, there's another aspect of our history that our younger brothers and sisters need to understand. The patrons of the Stonewall bar in Greenwich Village on that warm June night in 1969 were not the young, buff, perfectly-coiffed corporate types one might expect to see nowadays in some of the sleeker, more upscale gay bars of today. They were, by and large, gay men who were at the very margins of even gay society. They were predominantly drag queens and hustlers and drug addicts and runaways and the like. These were folks that didn't have a whole lot else to lose, who finally had enough of the brutal police abuse and repression to which they were routinely subject, and finally braved a stand-off with the police that is now commemorated as they birth of the modern gay rights movement. So, before any young person passes judgment on others who are perhaps more flamboyant or more effeminate or (in the case of lesbians) more masculine than he or she is comfortable with, he should consider the debt of gratitude he owes to people just these, and remember that were it not for the bravery of people just like the ones he now does not "much like," his little Republican ass wouldn't enjoy the luxury of openly belonging to a group like GOProud.
|