Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Does the CA.Constitution Actually Say RE: Gay Marriage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:00 AM
Original message
What Does the CA.Constitution Actually Say RE: Gay Marriage?
I keep hearing people talk about how Prop 8 goes against what the state's constitution says. Can someone tell me the exact wording? I have a feeling I will be debating this issue today and would like to know word for word what the state's constitution says about it.Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. CAs constitution is a nightmare abortion....
Modified over 500 times by public referendum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've often wondered which one is more convoluted, CA or FL.
Hey, our state constitution dictates the size of holding pens for pregnant sows. Beat that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a little complicated because of the prop system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would be more relevant to quote what the CA Supreme Court has said...
Edited on Wed May-27-09 01:10 PM by AntiFascist
from the previous marriage ruling, that gays and lesbians are to be considered a suspect class (in other words a protected minority) and marrige is a fundamental right for all. They stressed in yesterday's ruling that Prop 8 does nothing to take away from this, it simply restricts the definition of the word itself, but the rights remain. To many this would seem contradictory. State AG Jerry Brown's argument was that marriage is a fundamental right which falls out from the inalienable rights mentioned in Article 1 Section 1 of the state constitution, therefore, Prop 8 was an unconstitutional amendment. Unfortunately this particular argument did not go well before the state supreme court because it relied on very old case history, and no one seemed able to clearly define an 'inalienable right'.

On edit: you should also take a look, if you have time, at Justice Moreno's dissenting opinion because he basically shoots down the other justices' arguments on the Prop 8 ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC