Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what do you think of Obama's Iowa marriage joke?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:48 PM
Original message
So what do you think of Obama's Iowa marriage joke?
In his monologue at the Correspondent's dinner Obama told a joke about he and Axelrod deciding to run for President. He said they did what thousands of partners are now doing, went to Iowa and made it official. I won't offer an opinion yet, I am curious as to other people's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cecilfirefox Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well...
It's not demeaning, just a well made pun. So personally it doesn't bother me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since Iowa Is The First Caucus For Primaries
Edited on Sat May-09-09 10:55 PM by otohara
and now the first in the so-called "heartland" for same-sex-marriage - I thought it was cute how he tied the two together. That's what I took from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it was fine, but I am not gay so maybe
I don't have the right antenna to measure it. It is like being Jewish, there is stuff in jokes or comments that you will pick up on that others won't. One thing that I think is for sure is that there wasn't any malice, it was meant as a pun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Meh.
Edited on Sat May-09-09 11:01 PM by hulklogan
It would have been funnier if he were actually the fierce advocate he pretends to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm still waiting for somebody to do something with his use of the word "fierce" in thsi context
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cute pun... Neither rolling on the floor funny nor offensive.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. it was
perfect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. I agree. Perfect homophobia.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think it was funny nor do I think he as someone against equal rights
Should be joking about. I'm not pissed about it just disturbed that the president can make a joke about my civil rights but can't even put out a statement of congratulations for winning our basic civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. got the humor of it just fine thanx. now wanda...... :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. What I'm taking from it
Is that Obama is an insensitive asshole who just doesn't get it.

And before anyone comes in to tell me that it's just a joke (just a song, just a sermon, just a prayer, just a, just a, just a...) let me assure you that you're most likely in the multitude, even here, that Just. Don't. Get. It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So how did you feel about the jokes about specific people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No idea yet--I'd rather watch Torchwood than obsess over political theater
It's better, and honestly, Capt. Jack is much better looking. (Not to mention John Barrowman knows more about being gay than most people who will come here and tell us how we should feel.)

Still, at some point, I'll track down Wanda's monologue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Mmm, Jack/Ianto
Sorry, my pants just went to a very happy place.

And yeah I just can't work up the desire to watch the President crack jokes about my rights when he refuses to lift a finger to do anything to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Don't get it?
I don't get what you're getting at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Before reading anyone else's
I thought it was great. It wasn't disparaging what was going on in Iowa at all. I thought it was a great acknowledgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Personally
I think people who believe that other people shouldn't get married shouldn't be making jokes about other people finally being allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I don't think Obama is so set against gay marriage
He has said that due to his religious beliefs he believes that marriage is between a man and a woman. But he want to repeal DOMA, he wants to make sure that all federal rights given to married people are given to civil unions and (this is key) other legal recognized unions. That means that in places like Iowa, where gays can get married, marriage is what it is, and Obama will support that by ensuring that legally recognized union receive all federal benefits.

That's far different from, say, a Pat Robertson or a Rick Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Tell you what
If you think that Obama really wants to repeal DOMA, then you hold your breath. After your untimely demise, I'll arrange for a group to play Brahms' Requiem at your memorial service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Tell you what
Edited on Sun May-10-09 01:12 PM by Bolo Boffin
We'll just agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Ah,"Agree to Disagree". The Classic "I'm not a homphobe, I just see all sides" Final Response.
Edited on Sun May-10-09 06:13 PM by Toasterlad
So. Very. Lame.

Obama is on record as stating that he doesn't believe in same-sex marriage. What he does believe in is "civil unions", which amounts to separate water fountains for gays and straights. There is no way around it: Obama's position is cowardly, bigoted, and homophobic. If you want to "agree to disagree" that gay people shouldn't have the right to be married, you are a homophobe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. Dammit...
Now I'm laughing so hard I don't know if I'll make it through all the posts in the thread..

Perfect capturing of my evolving opinion on the subject...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. I see it as a positive. Why:
If he was the chicken shit on this issue that many portray him to be, he wouldn't have come near this topic, even with a "joke".

He's not that stupid, and he's not that insensitive, I think it was a way to acknowledge something he's glad passed in Iowa.

I think he's a friend of the GLBT community, though not a champion.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. What is that old saying....?
With friends like these?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
51. "he wouldn't have come near this topic"
What makes you say that? His statement didn't in any way endorse same-sex marriage. It was not a politically brave thing to say. It was safe and cowardly and offensive, as are all his comments on equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. As a gay Iowan
I thought it was hilarious and recognizes Iowa as such a great place to be right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. I admit to being of two minds about it
I don't particularly enjoy someone who is publicly against marriage equality telling jokes about it but I admit that he likely wouldn't have told the joke if he were going to not do anything for gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. I thought it was funny. Not the funniest he told but funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. It's funny but disingenuous.
It makes it sound as if he approves of marriage equality when he doesn't. He has a hemming and hawing position supporting civil unions. He thinks separate can be equal.

It makes it sound as if he might have supported marriage equality back when he was campaigning in Iowa. But we know how hard it was to drag any statement out of him supporting us, and then it was a late statement supporting marriage only for heterosexual couples but civil unions for us.

It's nice that he can joke about our marriages now, after we fought for this. But it's kind of sad too. Before hand he has to hem and haw and hedge his language and afterward he has to joke. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if he could have a serious conversation on this topic with us?

Wouldn't it be even nicer if he could have that serious conversation and actually support our civil rights. Though I suppose we'll have to settle for him acknowledging them in a joke.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
25. It was funny.
Edited on Sun May-10-09 01:26 AM by roody
How can he really believe that gay people should not marry? I think he is a politician, and when it becomes politically expedient, he will support gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
queerart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. What An Ordinary, Repugnant , And Ineffectual Troll You Are.....





perhaps he holds that union a sacred one as many people in this country do....perhaps he identifies the possibility of a slope that could lead towards a US in the future where a man could legally marry an 8 year old boy and he doesnt want to be a part of that




Are You On Drugs...... Or Just Profoundly Fucking Insane?


What a grimy, and debauched little sewer you have that passes as your mind.......


I won't bother to acknowledge you again, as you are unworthy of anyone's time.....










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. Wow
You're an idiot. And a troll. And a bigot - hey! You hit a trifecta!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. He is against the "war" in Iraq also.
He is a successful politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
26. Given the fact that he hadn't yet uttered ONE WORD
about the biggest civil rights advances in forty years (Iowa, Vermont, Maine), I thought it was kind of patronizing that his very first public reference to something so important to so many people was a joke.

Had he publicly commented on the series of events of the last few months prior to joking about them, it might have been more appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Exactly right.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. It was the first time he's ever reminded me of Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Seconded.
I might have felt entirely different if he had kept ANY of his campaign promises regarding gay rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Is he still the President, or did it end last night?
I swear you would think some DUers have never followed politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queerart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Mark Me Down As "Third" In Line To Your Comment.....

Some folks will never understand that they shouldn't be gnawing on bone that doesn't belong to them.......


It's bad manners at best...... but falls more in the "disingenuous category"........


If he had helped Gay Marriage get where it is today... this wouldn't even be a topic.....


But like most other Democrats, (and many Republicans I might add).........


They see opportunity to usurp a movement where they carried no water to the fire......


Then they make bumbling statements about partnerships..... or to tell Brownie how he has done a heckuva job......


It's all rather clear notwithstanding the fact that I'm quite sure I will be corrected by a multitude of "Non Queers" about how foggy my vision really is.......




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. He's such a loyal right winger when it comes to teh gays.
Edited on Sun May-10-09 02:47 AM by cboy4
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. ... and not just teh gays, but nearly everything else (seems like some days).
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
30. I didn't know he was aware of anything going on in Iowa.
As long as it's good for a gay chuckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. It would be nice if he did something besides joke about us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. Remember all the furor at DU
over alleged racist jokes (that no one can point to) and why those were so bad?

But homo jokes. Wow! A laugh riot! Obama should start doing stand up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
36. I think it's best for my health not to give my opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. lol
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
37. Fine. Shows he implicitly accepts the court's ruling, unlike Bush who railed against "activist judg
judges!" So I have no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusH Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
39. Have to admit that I'm a little surprised. I know he doesn't believe in civil equality, but joking?
Edited on Sun May-10-09 11:09 AM by RufusH
I had really hoped he would come around and do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
41. FINALLY! He mentioned the issue of gay marriage!
But it was a joke.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. My experience is audience & context are important when judging the efficacy of a joke.
Edited on Sun May-10-09 01:15 PM by jody
For example, my African-American relatives and friends often use the forbidden N word in their jokes because they are completely comfortable with me but I would never use that word, never because I know it may offend someone.

If the joke in question was told to an organization representing GLBT rights it would be received one way but told to an anti-GLBT organization it may be received differently.

I will defer to members of the GLBT forum on this incident but I hope Obama, with his background in constitutional law, finds a way to support CA's Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown in supporting cases that recognize "same sex marriage has the protection of Article 1 and, like other inalienable rights, cannot be taken away by a popular vote".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. I think his remarks trivialize gay lives. What's new?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pup_ajax Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wasn't really amused ...
Edited on Sun May-10-09 02:27 PM by pup_ajax
I've never liked this event because I hate to see Presidents making light of serious issues. I can't imagine anything worse than GW Bush making fun of not being able to find the weapons of mass destruction while so many were dying in Iraq. This isn't quite on that scale, but it still leaves me a tad bitter knowing that he so willingly sells out our civil rights for political expediency. He may be on our side, but he sure doesn't seem willing to step out on a limb and use his current political power to do the right thing right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. eh, not real funny
I never expected any leadership from him . Remember the marijuana question? at least we came off better than that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. He Should Shut His Fucking Mouth.
He has absolutely NO right to "joke" about equal rights, when he hasn't done SHIT to guarantee them. His little joke was EXACTLY as distasteful as Bush pretending to look for WMD in his office. You don't fucking joke about atrocities you help perpetuate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
52. It's indicative of his overall attitude and behavior toward us
He isn't, and never has been, a friend to the LGBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
58. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
59. After reading through - I feel like the only gay guy here who thought
it was a cute pun.

And rather than be offended that he mentioned such a historic milestone in a joke - I have to wonder - is this part of the same "in other, no big deal news today, Iowa, Vermont, Maine will begin legally recognizing same sex marriage" that is failing to stir up the base of opposition that this news has always met with (beyond the usual fundie pleas for more cash)

Think about it for a moment - Everyone was told all the horrors that would befall any area where marriage equality passed - and now, 5 years later practically all of Massachusetts neighbors have enacted it or are seriously on their way towards it.

In 5 years, we've gone from "end of the world" to "no big deal" - and the more gays and lesbians that get married and the four horseman don't come riding over the border - the easier it is for other Americans to realize that there is no downside to them for recognizing our rights to be treated equally.

Does Obama's silence prevent this recognition from growing? Or would him speaking out right now have a backlash effect?

Considering the man's political instincts that got him this far, against all odds - I'm still willing to trust that the man knows what he's doing up there in DC when it comes to political maneuvering - and that in the end we're going to be better for it.

His banking decisions? Not so much, but that's a topic for a different thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. As Long As the Federal Government Decrees That Gays Are Second Class Citizens...
...the President of the United States does not get to treat equality as "no big deal".

His silence and cowardice on this issue are reprehensible, and his willingness to joke about it is distasteful at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Jesus Effing Christ, snap the fuck OUT of it.
Stockholm Syndrome apologist much?

Substitute "jumping the broom" and the Dixiecrat of your choice for Obama, and then come back and say how fucking "cute" it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. Not apologizing for anything - simply a view that not all battles are
won with ordering the infantry to march straight ahead or the general to ride ahead on trusted steed.

All I'm saying is that I'm not the guy with the political skills to pull off the impossible things that he already has - along with bringing so many people along with him - I'm willing to trust his skills at this longer than it appears others are.

I hated the Rick Warren fiasco as much as anyone else here (and got my share of the homophobic "get over it" comments as well) but in the end, Warren is shown to look like a buffoon and loses some of his credibility - totally opposite of what I expected when it was announced.

States announce marriage equality - and in the near silence of the White House, there's nothing for the wingnuts to rail on the airwaves about - in that silence the only thing getting covered is Maggie Gallagher putting almost half the donated cash in her pocket, the parodies of NOM's ridiculous ad, and being called out for lying and using Miss California to push their bigoted agenda. While that is playing out, I don't want anyone to distract from it.

And yes, at this moment, I like the strategy of "it's no big deal that gay folks are getting married" (obviously it is to us) but it never should have been a big deal to anyone else - our equal rights take nothing from anyone. And as long as all those horrible predictions the fundies were making if we started marrying are shown to be false, then it simply paves the way for other states to do the right thing as well.

I think DOMA should be repealed - NOW
I think DADT should be repealed - NOW
I think all of us, in whatever state should get full marriage benefits on State & Fed level - NOW

But if you go back through the last 50 years of GLBT fight for rights - sometimes there were big, flashy things like Stonewall - but sometimes there were very quiet things that had bigger impact, like the board of the APA voting in 1973 to stop saying that we had a mental disorder. And that came from 3 years of lobbying the at their convention and letting them meet "normal" gay people instead of the just ones who had gone in for therapy of some kind.

Look at the fundie's ability to pass Prop 8 in the midst of an historic election 5 1/2 months ago. And the sea change of public opinion since then (including Iowa, Vermont, Maine & New Hampshire - which may not have come about without Prop 8 causing so many people to question what happened and how they really thought about it).

If he repealed DADT today? Every wingnut out there would be on TV non-stop talking about damage to our national security and the conversation would turn away from equal rights (the same way that the conversation is turning to how the Democrats allowed Cheney to torture versus the fact that Cheney tortured). The same with DOMA.

But in every movement, there are ebbs and flows. There came a moment where the People said, of course women should be able to vote. Of course African Americans shouldn't be slaves and should be treated as equals. And when those moments came, there was no turning back the tide.

Our moment is coming. And I, even though I'm probably in the minority am happy that the President is politically savvy enough not to do something prematurely to cause a backlash against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RomanHoliday Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
63. I liked it-- clever pun.
I have some disagreements with Obama on gay marriage but I think he's most gay-friendly of the major 08' candidates.

I think the joke was more about the popularity of the "bromance" these days. It was cute in a very I love you man or Pineapple Express way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Gay friendly....
I've yet to see it. Unless you count the lip service on DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC