Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pepperdine Alumni Not Happy With Ken Starr Defending Prop 8

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:08 AM
Original message
Pepperdine Alumni Not Happy With Ken Starr Defending Prop 8
Ah, that homosexual agenda,again. The hardest thing about a homosexual agenda is finding shoes that match.
:evilgrin:



http://laist.com/2009/03/05/pepperdine_alumni_not_happy_with_ke.php

Pepperdine Alumni Not Happy With Ken Starr Defending Prop 8
Dean Ken Starr of Pepperdine's School of Law is representing Prop 8 today at the California Supreme Court, which has alumni angry. "As dean of our alma mater, your advocacy on behalf of Proposition 8 is not only disappointing, it is a disgrace," an open letter to him posted on Facebook says. "While we support any individual's right to free speech, your views and actions are a de facto representation and reflection of Pepperdine University School of Law, as you are its figurehead, and we strongly urge the School of Law to make a public statement underscoring its desire for diversity, which includes lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students." The University did distance themselves from Prop 8 commercials before the November election, but no press release is posted on their website stating the school's separation from today's case.

Full press release from alumni is below.

Subject: Pepperdine School of Law Alumni protest Ken Starr’s representation of the Yes on Prop 8 coalition
On Thursday, March 5, 2009, Ken Starr, dean of Pepperdine University School of Law (SOL), will go before the California Supreme Court to defend the validity of the Proposition 8 ballot measure banning gay marriage in California. A diverse group of alumni (Alumni) from the SOL, straight and LGBT alike, have crafted a letter in opposition to Mr. Starr’s advocacy on behalf of the Yes on 8 coalition. “We have no issue with Dean Starr’s personal right to free speech on Prop 8, but the School of Law has not made any effort to separate itself from Mr. Starr’s upcoming appearance before the Supreme Court on this divisive issue, nor has the school made any statement affirming its desire for diversity and inclusion amongst its student body,” said Vikki Karan, one of the Alumni organizers.
The Alumni wish to express their disappointment in Mr. Starr’s advocacy of the Yes on 8 coalition for three reasons:

1. Mr. Starr is the figurehead and public face for the SOL and his personal position on Prop 8 has, in effect, become the de facto position of the SOL.

2. The SOL promotes the “diversity” among its student body to prospective students and purports to strive for diversity. Mr. Starr’s representation undermines the validity of those claims and stated goals.

3. The effect of Mr. Starr’s personal actions has a real impact on the SOL’s reputation, current students’ experiences, and the value of its alumni’s degrees.

The former students are requesting a statement from their alma mater that Dean Starr's actions are not representative of the SOL’s position on Prop 8 and that the school supports equality. "We want Dean Starr and Pepperdine School of Law to know many of its students, past, present and future, support full equality not only in California but across the country," said Jeremy Black, an Alumni organizer currently residing in New York.

The Alumni have created a Facebook group entitled, “Pepperdine Law Alums in Support of Repealing Prop 8” and are encouraging members of the group to update their status to speak out for marriage equality and against Dean Starr’s role as advocate for the Yes on Prop 8 groups. The Alumni intend to deliver the letter to Mr. Starr and other officials at Pepperdine University on March 5, 2009, the date of the hearing.

Starr's defense of Prop 8 coincides with this weekend's Pepperdine SOL Alumni Reunion. Starr himself will be attending the 32nd Annual Law School Dinner which begins 6:30pm on Saturday, March 7th at The Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, California. Other activities include a Conversation with Justice Antonin Scalia at 12:30pm on Monday, March 9th at Pepperdine School of Law in Malibu, California. Justice Scalia wrote the dissenting opinion in the landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case, LAWRENCE V. TEXAS where he railed against the "so-called homosexual agenda" and “homosexual activists.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. this coming from pepperdine -- colour me surprised. pleasantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. The way to show the displeasure, IMO, is to NOT contribute.
Schools are ALWAYS asking for $$$. Shut the wallet and let the school know very specifically it was because of what Starr did on Prop H8.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have stopped donating to my Catholic college because of what the church did on Prop H8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tex-Slim Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. NO IRONY HERE
A local newsie in SoCal made what has to be the most ironic remark in this whole sad affair. Commenting on his certainty that, given the near certainty that this court will rule that Prop 8 will stand, he went on to insist that a new proposition to overturn it was imminent. As in should come, and should receive overwhelming popular support and pass, in 2010 perhaps?

The ironic part?

He said that he was certain, should that happen, that the Pro-8 people would accept the will of the masses, just like the Anti-8 crowd did. Something like that.

I almost had a heart attack, I laughed so hard. I mean, I literally could not breathe for long enough that I started to pass out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Many CA bar associations opposed Prop 8 and the ABA rules require schools to support GLBT equality
This charlatan should be removed from his post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. More about Preppy-dyin' from a gay alumn
http://www.justout.com/jims_closet.aspx?id=45
Higher Learning
Confessions of an angry alumnus

by Jim Radosta

“Be true to your school,” The Beach Boys sang in 1963.

But what if your school isn’t true to you?

I’m referring to my alma mater, Pepperdine University, which made headlines recently for its perceived support of Proposition 8, a hateful effort to overturn the California Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage. The well-funded Yes on 8 campaign debuted its first television spot Sept. 29, including a fear-mongering claim that acceptance of same-sex marriage is “mandatory.”

“That changes a lot of things,” Pepperdine law professor Richard Peterson warns in the ad, “people sued over personal beliefs, churches could lose their tax exemptions, gay marriage taught in public schools.”

Progressive Portlanders might be horrified to see an institute of “higher learning” stepping into such a divisive minefield, but Pepperdine isn’t your typical university. For starters, the Malibu, Calif.-based school is affiliated with the Church of Christ, which frowns on dancing and putting women in positions of power.

When I arrived on campus in 1990 to pursue a bachelor’s degree in journalism, Pepperdine had just recently lifted its ban on campus dances. A couple of years later, the female dean of students was allowed to lead the prayer at a school assembly—one small step for womankind.

Like so many conservatives, Pepperdine also confuses faith with politics. As a student it was hard to tell whether I was at college or at a GOP think tank: Invited speakers included the likes of former Attorney General Ed Meese and Solicitor General Ken Starr, who went on to achieve infamy as the independent counsel who spent $40 million of taxpayer money on a witch hunt to destroy President Bill Clinton. Oh, and guess who’s now on staff shaping the minds of future lawyers? You got it: Law School Dean Kenneth Starr.

So, given that track record, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Pepperdine remains in lockstep with the right-wing agenda by opposing equal rights for all couples. Or does it? After a vocal outcry from alumni who were furious about the Yes on 8 ad, the administration tried to distance itself from the campaign.

“We’d like to stress that the professor does not represent a Pepperdine University-endorsed position, as the university does not advocate for/against political candidates or ballot propositions,” public relations executive director Jerry Derloshon said Oct. 2. “The professor in the ad was not advocating a Pepperdine position, but his own personal position. We have received confirmation that our request to have the reference to Pepperdine University deleted from the ad will be honored…perhaps by today.”

Since that statement was issued, Pepperdine’s name has yet to be removed from the ad. In fact, Peterson shows up again in an even more inflammatory spot that uses the ultimate scare tactic: A little girl comes home from school and excitedly tells Mommy about how she’s going to grow up to marry a “princess.”

“Think it can’t happen? It’s already happened!” Peterson bellows. “When Massachusetts legalized gay marriage, schools began teaching second-graders that boys can marry boys. The courts ruled parents had no right to object.”

The deception tactics already seem to be succeeding. While early polls indicated Prop 8 was behind by as much as 38 percent to 55 percent, the ads are being credited with flipping numbers around: Led by a major shift among young Californians, a CBS survey says that likely voters now favor the measure by a five-point margin, 47 percent to 42 percent.

For a school that boasts “the highest standards of academic excellence and Christian values,” Pepperdine doesn’t seem to place much importance on either. California law already bans bias based on religion and prohibits public schools from teaching students anything about family issues against the will of their parents, so Peterson’s bogus declarations put the entire university’s reputation on the line.

Furthermore, the school isn’t exactly being Christlike by spreading the lie that it knew nothing about the professor’s involvement. According to its student newspaper, The Graphic: “Peterson said he informed School of Law Vice Dean Tim Perrin in advance that he was appearing in the commercial and that he would be associated with Pepperdine. Perrin did not voice any concerns, according to Peterson.”

This isn’t the first time that Pepperdine has underestimated the backlash that comes from homophobia. Way back in 1992, when I was editor of The Graphic, a group of underground gay students approached me to make their presence known. In the middle of the night, they had painted a pink triangle on “The Rock”—the only free-speech zone on campus—but it was immediately covered up by a Bible-banging adversary.

When I called that student for a comment, his blunt reply was shocking: “No way is homosexuality tolerated or should be tolerated. If they want to paint it during the day, I’ll watch over them with my baseball bat.”

The bigot was surely expecting backslaps and high-fives, but my article ended up turning him into a campus pariah, and he eventually transferred to an even more conservative university. It was a tense time—especially for a closeted student like me—but at least it got people talking.

In a follow-up story, I interviewed one sensitive administrator who said a mouthful: “I would hope on a campus like this that we’re able to talk about issues like this in less emotional, less confrontive kind of ways. I suspect that we’ll be talking about those things on campus for a long time.”

Arts and Culture Editor Jim Radosta needs your feedback. E-mail him at jim@justout.com.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kudos to you from a fellow 'Dine Alumn '89. Wish I'd known you then.
Of course, I was completely closeted at the time, but my better-self instincts would doubtless have clued me in. ;)

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. When we look at the damage Starr has done historically, isn't it time to retire him?
How much time, money, and diversion from governance did the repug witch hunt of the Monica-gate era cost our nation? Starr spearheaded that.

Now this, a clearly immoral position promoting the tyranny of the majority.

Bigotry damages both the perpetrator and the victim.

In the new book about DADT, by Nathaniel frank, we now learn how the military was damaged by ousting 12,000 gay and lesbian military members.

I think the nation is catching on, but not quickly enough. The bigots are still out there, plying their evil craft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC