Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Stephen Reinhardt declares the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:48 PM
Original message
Judge Stephen Reinhardt declares the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 04:53 PM by FreeState
Two Federal Lawyers Win Benefits for Same-Sex Spouses in 9th Circuit Orders
Posted 9 hours, 31 minutes ago
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Two federal judges on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have required payment of health insurance benefits to same-sex spouses of lawyers employed by the U.S. government.

Judge Stephen Reinhardt and Chief Judge Alex Kozinski issued the orders as hearing officers for circuit employee disputes, the Daily Journal reports (sub. req.). Reinhardt’s order declared the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, while Kozinski’s order didn’t reach the “hard question” of the statute’s constitutionality. Instead, he said ambiguous language in a federal health benefits act allowed him to order benefits, the story says.

The cases were brought by Deputy Federal Public Defender Brad Levenson of Los Angeles and 9th Circuit staff lawyer Karen Golinski, according to the story. Lawyers from Morrison & Foerster represented Golinski on a pro bono basis.

Jennifer Pizer, senior counsel and director of the national marriage project at Lambda Legal in Los Angeles, acknowledged that the orders do not create direct precedent. But she told the Daily Journal that “they will become part of our national conversation about fairness and equality for same-sex couples."

http://www.abajournal.com/news/two_federal_lawyers_win_benefits_for_same-sex_spouses_in_9th_circuit_orders/

---

Its a good start. Lets hope for more and more of this in the lower court can change the law without having to wait for politicians

EDIT here is the text of the ruling and further commentary: http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2009/02/ding-dong-the-domaaswell-crippled.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love the 9th!
:loveya: They have always been on the forefront of all the good judgements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. be glad Ted Stevens is gone. He has always tried to break them
up. I love them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HurrahforHil Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will the Religous Reich appeal?
If this makes it to SCOTUS then this could become an earthshaking decision in the GLBT movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Four big Constitutional reasons why it will be struck down.
Full faith and credit clause.
Ex post facto clause.

Two goodies in the 14th Amendment: Due process and equal protection of the laws.


Really a slam dunk. It just takes time to get through the appellate process.


Yes I am a lawyer but I do not play one on TV. :D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC