|
Before I attended university, I was only required to study two years of foreign language in high school (which was Spanish, the only foreign language that they offered). Needless to say, trying to begin learning another language when you are already 16 is a bit more difficult than at a younger age. I believe that linguists generally agree that people who begin to learn another language after the age of eight (or somewhere around there) will never be as good of speakers as a true native speaker of the language in question.
Similar to high school, at university I was also required to take two more years of a foreign language (I tried Russian that time). While these introductory classes do help students understand language in general, they do not produce many proficient speakers. Most students simply want to complete the two years of classes so that they can graduate. Only teaching students foreign languages in high school or university does not produce enough proficient speakers/readers of foreign languages.
Linguists also say that students typically need to be 'immersed' in the language to learn it (such as traveling abroad to study it). Of course, traveling abroad can be quite expensive, so that is not a viable solution for all students.
The real solution, I think, is to begin teaching K-12 bilingually. All students would be taught English + another language of the local community's choice. This would, over time, vastly increase the number of Americans who understand foreign languages, and it would be fair as well. Only 10% of Americans are ethnically English, so it should not be the only language of the country.
Thoughts?
|