Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times Misleads on Taliban Role in Opium Trade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
shoeshock Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:10 AM
Original message
New York Times Misleads on Taliban Role in Opium Trade
The New York Times and other major U.S. media sources commonly report on the production of opium in Afghanistan as though it were under the control of the Taliban. The facts on the ground, however, tell a different story. Who dominates the Afghan opium trade? Foreign Policy Journal investigates.


The New York Times reported this week that the Taliban have cut back on poppy cultivation and is stockpiling opium, grossly overstating the group’s role in the Afghanistan drug trade.


“Afghanistan has produced so much opium in recent years,” the Times reported Thursday, “that the Taliban are cutting poppy cultivation and stockpiling raw opium in an effort to support prices and preserve a major source of financing for the insurgency, Antonio Maria Costa, the executive director of the United Nations drug office, says."


Read more here: http://www.inteldaily.com/news/143/ARTICLE/8856/2008-12-01.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. You really like this publication. Do you read any others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. yup! we have done a FINE job!
What the reports fail to acknowledge is that the Taliban government was instrumental in implementing a successful drug eradication program, with the support and collaboration of the UN.

Implemented in 2000-2001, the Taliban's drug eradication program led to a 94 percent decline in opium cultivation. In 2001, according to UN figures, opium production had fallen to 185 tons. Immediately following the October 2001 US led invasion, production increased dramatically, regaining its historical levels.

The Vienna based UN Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that the 2006 harvest will be of the order of 6,100 tonnes, 33 times its production levels in 2001 under the Taliban government (3200 % increase in 5 years).

Cultivation in 2006 reached a record 165,000 hectares compared with 104,000 in 2005 and 7,606 in 2001 under the Taliban http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060921&articleId=3294
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's why the Bush drug cartel wanted Afghanistan...notice how production went
through the roof after the U.S. invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Same lie as with all allied narco-states...
In Colombia too, it's the insurgents and never the narco-government who produce the drugs. Whereas guess whose fault it is in Venezuela or Bolivia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC