Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legitimacy of Pot Tax Revenue Remains Hazy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 06:55 AM
Original message
Legitimacy of Pot Tax Revenue Remains Hazy
California's potential $16 billion budget shortfall has led state officials to an unusual source for tax revenue — medical marijuana storefronts. In a state where it's legal to buy prescription pot, those shops generate millions of dollars each year. But there's just one problem — buying and selling marijuana is still a federal crime.

...

Medical marijuana advocates estimate that the aggregate annual sales tax revenue that's paid by the approximately 400 dispensaries in California is $100 million. Kris Hermes, a spokesman for Americans for Safe Access, says the state actually makes it easy for pot venders to do business without revealing their product by issuing generic "sellers permits."

"This goes a few steps forward in legitimizing medical marijuana at the state level," he says. "And you would expect that the state would like to protect that revenue source."

California's Board of Equalization, the agency that collects sales taxes, wants to protect that revenue stream.

NPR
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Firethorn Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. What I've said a number of times...
1. Legalize it
2. Regulate it(for safety)
3. Tax it

And you've just turned a money sink into a money mine.

By legalize it I mean no half measures like decriminalization - when you do that you generally leave aspects criminal, and therefore subject to all the nastiness that tends to infect criminal enterprises.

By Regulate I mean 'similar to alcohol/tobacco'. 18 or 21 to purchase, in as safe of a form as possible, not adulterated with hazardous substances, etc... I'm fully aware that many of these substances are, by nature, at least somewhat poisonous. But I go by the model of prohibition - during prohibition you often got alcohol contaminated with methanol - drastically increasing the toxicity. When prohibition ended this problem essentially disappeared.

Tax it - Great way to sell the legalization to the public, balance the budget, and fund common sense treatment centers for non-functional addicts*


*Lets face it, we generally don't do anything for functional addicts of alcohol & tobacco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC