Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's true. Some in the pro-life movement really think people should have less sex.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:40 PM
Original message
It's true. Some in the pro-life movement really think people should have less sex.
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 08:47 PM by Iris
Mary Boyert, pro-life director at the Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, actually says this in this interview:

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wabe/news.newsmain/article/223/0/1507883/WABE.Features/Mary.Boyert.Talks.Family.Planning.Counterp3oint..Part.2
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Some in the pro-life movement should go sex themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Boni Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-27-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Go forth and multiply. Is that what you meant?
Right, I agree. I love children, family and life the more of all of these the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. This reminds me of a line from a TV show.
Aaron Sorkin's Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip.

Matt Albie: Hey, I'm all in favor of teen abstinence. I'm just saying, as a former teen--it's not going to happen. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. what's worse, this woman said "people" - she did not say "teenagers"
and I can tell you as person, it's not going to happen. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I get it and agree, but thought it was a funny and appropriate response. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It was!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. It reminds me of this passage from A Free Man's Worship by Bertrand Russell.
http://users.drew.edu/~JLENZ/br-fmw.html
And seeing the present was bad, he (man) made it yet worse, that thereby the future might be better. And he gave God thanks for the strength that enabled him to forgo even the joys that were possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that really says it all, Towlie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Do you want me to seduce you? Is that what you're trying to tell me?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can't Go Below Zero, Sorry
Was this a nun speaking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. No. A layperson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. George Carlin was so right
Anti-abortionists are people you wouldn't want to f*** in the first place.

If you're going to use "logic" like that, how about this: To reduce pregancies and abortions, encourage homosexual behavior. :rofl:

Or how about this, Mary Boyert: Ask your Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta to preach the gospel of "Let's discourage priests from having so much sex with helpless children." Now that's a reduction in sex that the whole country could get enthused about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. LESS sex?? Hell, they want people who aren't married to have NO sex.
I've been told on more than one occasion that, even at age 52, I had no business having sex because I wasn't married. They expect people to turn into dried up old virgins and simply do without. I say FUCK YOU AND THE BIBLE YOU RODE IN ON, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. yes - no sex for the unmarried and less sex for married couples
yeah. right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Now that's really not news.
Edited on Sat Jun-06-09 03:13 AM by caseymoz
Sometimes I think a large part of the divide might be that some people have very low sex drives and most have normal to high sex-drives. The former can't understand why everybody just can't just abstain when they can. To them, also, a normal or high sex drive could only be explained not by hormonal levels, but by a decision to sin. They also don't have any idea why everyone can't use the rhythm method. People like that seem pretty smug to me because they credit their self-control. I mean, even if they have twelve kids, they've probably had sex only thirteen times, and it felt pretty good at least half the time. How do you explain the sensations of foreplay and orgasm to somebody who has never been able to feel them that intensely, who wonders why everyone is so obsessed with sex?

I know for a fact that behind the anti-choice thinking is a premise that the root of the problem is sin, and that the first sin in the process is sex, rather, improper sex, which leads to the sin of murder (abortion). They don't want to prevent births; otherwise, they would be embracing birth control. No, they want to stop sin. You can't win by arguing practicality with them; they see a different problem than what pro-choice people see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Interesting take, caseymoz. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rebecca_herman Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. interesting point
I'm not a fundie or anything but I do not really "get" the importance of sex or why people want it so much. I get that I'm different from most people in that regard and I must have a very low sex drive, so perhaps a drive like that combined with fundie tendancies can produce that mindset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Libertyfirst Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. People who support less sex are those who have never had good sex. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rebecca_herman Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. nt
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 08:06 PM by rebecca_herman
replied to wrong post oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
musical_soul Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. I favor sex education.
I want people to learn all the different ways to protect themselves.

However, the idea that one can't keep from having sex is bogus. I understand that sex is a really wonderful experience.
However, it's important to keep from having babies until ready. If that means not having sex sometimes (or all the time), then
so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. If you feel that way, go for it but I think it's impractical and inhumane to expect others to forgo
Edited on Wed Jul-01-09 12:09 AM by Iris
one of life's greatest pleasures.


Also, see post 11 above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
musical_soul Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I think......
there are different levels of self-control. The level I'm the most concerned about is simply waiting
until one is an adult or at least a late teenager. There are some ages that are just too young to be having sex.

I also think one can get the pleasure they need in other ways. We do it all the time.

Anyway, self-control can also come in the form of simply waiting until they find somebody they really care about. We don't have to let our hormones control us on every date.

I also wonder whether one who can't ever refrain from having sex (because their hormones are controlling them that much) is the type of person who can *always* use birth control correctly.

If one wants to have sex on a just because basis, that's their business. However, I object to this concept that we can't control ourselves. We all have free will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-03-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Apparently Mary has not been to some public schools.
If you are a male and if they find out that you are a virgin, they'll perceive you as a gay male. If you are a female, they'll perceive you as a female lesbian, and teenage lesbians are more of risk of teen pregnancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lk9650 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. ironic
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. way
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aoyatuo Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. no married?
maybe all people should go to monastery and convent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gwashington2650 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. Stupid prudes
Another reason why I HATE religious types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC