1.
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- With a brighteyed little girl named Autumn and members of her family present, Gov. Mark Sanford held a ceremony August 22, 2005, to sign Autumn's Law that prevents rapists from claiming "parental rights" to a child conceived as a result of criminal sexual conduct.
Autumn's Law is named for the child who was conceived when her mother was raped at the age of 14. When Autumn's grandparents, Jimmy
and Ginger Foisey of Sumter, attempted to adopt Autumn, the rapist threatened to claim parental and visiting rights unless they agreed to drop the criminal charges. The Foiseys refused and were forced to hire an attorney to fight the rapist in court. Ultimatly Mr. and Mrs. Foisey adopted Autumn for the child’s protection.
PDF document:
http://sclife.org/abortionlawsinsc/AutumnsLaw.pdf2.
Defender of Rapist in Parental Rights Case
Lehigh Valley Legal Services of Pennsylvania recently tried to give a teenage rapist custody of a child he fathered by his rape of a 13-year-old. Legal services attorneys argued the case even though a psychologist concluded he would endanger the child if given such rights. Nevertheless, they tried to argue that termination of the criminal’s parental rights was unconstitutional on the grounds that rape is not defined in the adoption act.
See The Morning Call (Allentown), March 2, 1995
source:
http://www.nlpc.org/lsap/report/Issues/rep04.htm3.
The Baby Emily Case That Prompted the Florida Law
The Florida legislature was inspired to create the Act after the case of baby Emily - a three-year legal battle in which the baby's father, a convicted rapist, tried to contest the baby's adoption long after she was adopted. The court eventually ruled in favor of the adoptive parents, and against the father.
The Act was intended to prevent similar future suits by ensuring that, before an adoption took place, the fathers' parental rights had been terminated in a way that accorded with constitutional due process standards - with potential fathers being provided notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Before the Act was passed, Florida law (like that of most states) already provided that a father's pre-adoption consent had to be procured if his paternity had been already established or presumed - due to marriage, adoption, a court decision, a paternity test, his formal acknowledgment of paternity, or his "repetitive" or "customary" support to the child or mother during the pregnancy.
source:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=/commentary/20020829_hodes.html