and in other news ...

[iverglas]

Okay ... it may not be exactly about "choice" or "reproductive freedom" ...

http://www.dogcondoms.com/product-recall.html

Initial clinical trials with training veterinary staff yielded good results for Dog Condoms®. The statistics for incidents of unplanned conception for unaltered canines using the condom while engaging in mating behavior represented less than .5% of the clinical sample group. However, the success of these veterinary trials did not carry over into their use by dog owners in test markets. Following three months of limited consumer trials in seven test market cities across the U.S., consumers using the product reported 102 incidents of unwanted pregnancies resulting from apparent failure of Dog Condoms® products.

Another 15 consumers reported choking incidents resulting from animals attempting to ingest Dog Condoms® meat-scented condoms. No fatalities were reported as a result of the choking incidents, but medical intervention was required in 4 cases.

... but I couldn't resist.

[BlueEyedSon]

1. A Hoax site

[iverglas]

2. oh dear!

Well, hoaxes are fun.

I was just browsing www.fuckedcompany.com and didn't know they included hoaxes in their reports. ;)

I *always* look at the main portals of websites where I read something ... except this time. I just chortled.

[BlueEyedSon]

3. Guess they got punkt