Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Defense objects to evidence that Bonds’ testicles shrunk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:51 PM
Original message
Defense objects to evidence that Bonds’ testicles shrunk
It appears certain members of the sports forum have signed on with the prosecution over their fascination with Barry's manhood. :eyes:





By Jonathan Littman, Yahoo! Sports 13 hours, 3 minutes ago

SAN FRANCISCO – Courtroom 10 in the federal courthouse should be free of crude discussion of Barry Bonds’ allegedly shriveled testicles, supposed premature baldness and rumored massive head – at least that was the spirited argument Wednesday in a defense filing in the perjury case.

The motion by Bonds’ attorneys addressed scientific and lay testimony proposed by the prosecution that the defense believes Judge Susan Illston should prohibit in her “gatekeeping role.”

Attorneys for the former slugger charged that one of the government’s expert witnesses on steroids, Larry Bowers, while the senior managing director of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and an accomplished chemist, “is not even a medical doctor” and “does not claim to have treated, let alone examined a single individual who was known or suspected of using steroids or HGH.”

The defense derided the science and studies that Bowers and the government cited that allege steroid and human growth hormone use by Bonds would have been witnessed by a former girlfriend, teammates and others in the form of physical symptoms: shrunken testicles, male pattern baldness, and a giant skull and fingers.

“The Court must be especially vigilant to ensure that misleading and prejudicial testimony is not presented,” wrote lawyer Allen Ruby, who added that the suggestion that Bonds exhibited symptoms of “roid rage” could create “the potential of a sideshow of criticism from biased witnesses concerning Mr. Bonds’ personality.”

As to allegations about Bonds’ testicles, the defense claimed a failure of proof. Alleging that Bonds’ former mistress Kimberly Bell had pressed a legal claim against the slugger and shopped a book about their relationship, Ruby noted that no medical evidence had been introduced to support her claim to “have noticed that Mr. Bonds’ testicles became smaller.”

Visual inspection apparently won’t do. Ruby noted that a “layperson” would have difficulty detecting diminished testicles “even by touch.”

The only reliable means of measurement, Ruby wrote, is by a “trained examiner” using a special device called an orchidometer.

Whether Bonds’ testicles, lack of hair, cranium size or mood swings become the subject of expert or lay testimony at trial rests with Illston, who is expected to rule on admissible evidence any day.


NOW I'VE HEARD EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "I'd give my left nut for a home run crown"
and the Lord sayeth, barry I'll need both of them for that feat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. OK, that was very clever .. unless you stole the line
from someone. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No Cboy I did not steal it
I have and could again make a living as a writer. Your reply reminds me of one of the great movie lines of all time.

"I don't know what scruples are but I know if you got em you stole em from someone else." Addie Pray talking to her Daddy in Paper Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thats actual legitimate science/biology with steroid users
but I'm thinking you wouldn't actually know anything about that, being about as logical/scientific as a swamp rat.
And gee I'm a biologist so I CERTAINLY wouldn't know anything either.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. It'll never hold up in court
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I 'got' it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was reading about this the other day
sounds to me as if the persecution, er, prosecution is getting desperate. If the judge refuses to allow those so called "positive" tests, then they have to rely on all sorts of nonsense to make their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes just like that unreliable DNA testing
the physiological effects of steroid abuse is little known or studied..:sarcasm:
Read THIS:
http://www.medicinenet.com/anabolic_steroid_abuse/page4.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. This article is hilarious.
Never, in my life, did I think I'd read an article in the sports forum about small nuts, bald dude and giant heads.:rofl: If there's a jury trial, how anyone keeps a straight face is beyond me. Maybe I'm immature, but I'd laugh my ass off the whole time. Just thinking about it and I have tears rolling down my face.

Shrunken testicles and giant heads....it's like bizarro world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. And here I've been using my orchidometer
to measure my orchids, no wonder they aren't getting very big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-06-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Saaay Whaaat?
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who in this thread likes cock?
Who in this thread would have a fascination with men's bodies? Sounds like classic projection from the OP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC