Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How would you seed a I-A college football playoff bracket?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 02:43 PM
Original message
How would you seed a I-A college football playoff bracket?
Pretend Division I-A gets its act together and has a genuine playoff next year. How would you seed the bracket? How many teams would there be, who would get automatic bids, and who would get at-large bids?

I think a 16-team playoff would be ideal. It would start in early December, have three Saturdays of elimination rounds, then have a championship game on New Year's Day. This is essentially what the other three divisions do.

Automatic bids would go to any conference champion that has at least 8 wins over I-A opponents. This puts all conferences on equal footing while setting some minimum bar for participation. Then, the remaining slots would go to the highest-ranked teams that didn't win a conference. Something like the current BCS rankings could fulfill this function. Once the participants are selected, seeding would be done by a committee.

This year's participants, in no particular order, would be
Wake Forest (ACC champ)
Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)
Louisville (Big East champ)
Houston (C-USA champ)
Central Michigan (MAC champ)
Ohio State (Big 10 champ)
BYU (Mountain West champ)
Florida (SEC champ)
USC (Pac 10 champ)
Boise State (WAC champ)
Michigan (BCS #3)
LSU (BCS #4)
Wisconsin (BCS #7)
Auburn (BCS #9)
Notre Dame (BCS #11)
Arkansas (BCS #12)

Troy won the Sun Belt conference, but only beat 6 I-A opponents, all in its own conference, and thus would not get an automatic bid. West Virginia (BCS #13) would be the highest-ranked team not to go.

Comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was just doing the math with a co-worker
And if Division 1-A did a 32 team playoff...it would take one less game than they currently have bowl games. A 32 team playoff takes 5 rounds and 31 games to get a winner. There are 32 bowl games this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Counciltucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. 16 teams: the 11 conference champions, 5 at-large bids.
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 07:34 PM by Counciltucky
This to me makes the most sense. It's not perfect, but as we've all found out with the BCS, nothing is. And let the bowls have the rest of the teams.

(Edited to add last sentence.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, this is what the other divisions do
Although I still like the idea of having a minimum standard for a conference champion to qualify. Without that, you run the risk of the division fragmenting into super-weak conferences that exist just to provide automatic bids. The Sun Belt Conference is what I have in mind, where the entire conference comes up with about half a dozen non-conference wins each year.

But it would have to be an objective standard -- like eight wins against D I-A opponents -- not like the BCS setup, in which some conferences are in a permanent underclass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Also unlike the BCS: No poll should play a roll
I would do it just like basketball––with a committee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. agreed, football polls especially are for shite
Nobody had Penn ST. in their poll even though they are an arguable top ten team.

Boise St. is good but doesnt make it past round two of a playoff system. Same with Louisville and WV out of the Big East
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. going with teams listed in post, here it goes
In this bracket I seeded one through sixteen but gave the top four seeds to the big four conference champs, Big10, SEC, PAC10 and Big12. After that I did my best seeding job and included the bowl results so far.

1 Ohio St.
16 C. Mich

3 USC
14 BYU

5 LSU
12 Arkansas

7 Boise St.
10 Louisville

8 Wisc.
9 Auburn

6 Mich
11 Wake Forest

4 Oklahoma
13 Notre Dame

2 Florida
15 Houston

That's figuring that conference champs don't get automatic top bids. It probably works better for teams like Boise St. anyway, do they really want to play an undrrated Wisconsin or a much better LSU first anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC