Based on her claims that "the theory is firmly based on Scripture" and "most Bible scholars agree...," I'd have to conclude the proper answer is "an idiot who knows nothing about Christianity outside (her own?) fundamentalist circles." Seriously, I'd like to challenge her: find
any non-fundy Bible scholars that believe in a "rapture." (Prepare for the sound of crickets chirping.)
I don't want to blow my own horn, but what I wrote in a different thread tonight is a lot more informative than Fairchild's nonsense:
The "rapture," on the other hand, comes from a literalistic misreading of a passage in the first letter of Paul to the Thessalonians. At the time that letter was written (very early in the years after Jesus), it was assumed the "second coming" would be happening any day now, so that all the followers could be taken up into the kingdom of God straightaway. Thus, there was the concern about converts who, due to age or accident, died before that could occur. Would that mean they had missed out on salvation? In answer to this question, Paul writes:
But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers and sisters, about those who have died, so that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have died. For this we declare to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will by no means precede those who have died. For the Lord himself, with a cry of command, with the archangel's call and with the sound of God's trumpet, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air; and so we will be with the Lord forever.
It seems clear that the entire passage is a response to the issue mentioned in the first line. Thus the passage uses poetic imagery to get across the point of all Christians, dead and still alive, being taken up into the new dimension ("the air") that is the presence of God. Indeed, as far as I can tell, no Christian leaders or theologians considered this to be a literal description of an event for the first 1,600 years of Christian history. It only became a doctrine among Puritans here in the American colonies, and then picked up by John Darby, the British co-founder of the Plymouth Brethren in the nineteenth century, but remained obscure until popularized by Hal Lindsay in "The Late Great Planet Earth" in the 1970s.
The above is the
only Biblical reference to "the rapture," and I think you'll agree that it is a case of fundamentalists seizing on a passage without understanding the context, taking it literally, and reducing it to gibberish.
As usual.