Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faith Healing Parents Assert Religious Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:52 PM
Original message
Faith Healing Parents Assert Religious Rights
They Want Charges Dropped in Faith Healing Death of Their Toddler Daughter
By DEAN SCHABNER
Dec. 10, 2008

A Clackamas County, Ore., couple accused of letting their infant daughter die by relying on prayer, rather than medicine, today asked that the charges be dropped, arguing that they infringe on their freedom of religion and their right to raise their children in their own way.



Carl Worthington, 28, and his wife, Raylene, 25, belong to a church that believes in faith healing, and police said that, instead of going to a doctor when their 15-month-old daughter Ava got sick, they turned to prayer.

The infant girl died March 2 from bacterial bronchial pneumonia and an infection, both of which could have been cured with common antibiotics, the medical examiner said.

<snip>

"Mr. and Mrs. Worthington maintain that their prosecution contravenes their right 'to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences,' as guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Oregon and the Constitution of the United States," the motion said. "Further, Mr. and Mrs. Worthington urge that this prosecution contravenes their fundamental right to raise their children without interference by the State." A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Jan. 7, 2009.
<snip>

A decade ago, the church received national attention after ABC News affiliate KATU-TV in Portland, Ore., reported that the state medical examiner believed approximately 20 children, whose parents belonged to the church, had died from untreated illnesses that were curable.

ANIMALS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. sorta like people who beat their child to death. only, this one took longer and hurt more.
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 08:01 PM by enki23
is the death penalty applicable?

so, i want to know: if your child is choking, should one sit back and let "god" make its decision? if your child is drowning, is it ok to pull her out? if your baby is perched at the top of the stairs, should you pick him up? or does "let god decide" only apply to easily curable diseases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOCK THEM UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Guarantee you they’ll get a slap on the wrist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Something like that happened a few years ago in Massachusetts.
The cultists were found guilty of murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. It wasn't the prayer that killed her
it was the lack of appropriate medicine. I don't understand why people think they can't do both. In any event, I hope they get the absolute maximum. This sort of thing is unacceptable. What's going to be next, faith feeding? Praying instead of giving your kids food?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. The state has a vested interest in a born citizen
and someone should have stood up for this child and called the authorities.

This isn't religious freedom, this is neglect of someone who is unable to speak in his or her own behalf.

Manslaughter doesn't seem out of the question for these loons. A codefendant should be the preacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hope they only practice faith healing on themselves...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC