I think Creationsim should be taught in Science class

[edhopper]

BUT, only if the questions over existence of Jesus and the accuracy of the Bible can me taught in History class.

If debate is good, then debate is good. QED

[Orrex]

1. Creationism should be taught in science classes

And it should be taught like this:

"Creationism is 100% bullshit based entirely on mythology that predates the smelting of iron."

[notadmblnd]

2. You go to church to go to learn about Jesus

If you want him taught in the class room, send your children to a religious school.

You know, my son asked me one time (when he was about 7) to take him to church. I obliged. The next week I asked him if he wanted to go again, he said no thanks. I guess he wasn't all that impressed with it.

[edhopper]

3. I guess you didn't

get the overall sarcastic tone of my post?

[JaneQPublic]

4. Creationism taught in Science class only if Science is taught in Church (nt)

[Realityhack]

5. I dissagree. I am ok with those topics in history...

I am NOT OK with creationism in science class.

Creationism can not legitimately be considered science.
The existence of a historical Jesus could legitimately be considered history.
The accuracy of the bible could also be legitimately considered history.

A better parallel would be teaching that Jesus was a black man from China in history class (or some other equally absurd claim).