Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about Ohio Electors: Are they legally obliged to cast their vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 12:23 AM
Original message
Question about Ohio Electors: Are they legally obliged to cast their vote
for the 'certified winner'? I know most states are, but here in Oklahoma, if they don't it's a misdemeanor (small fine)..just wondering. I could probably google this but thought some Ohioan might know off the bat...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fortunato Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Electors summary
Edited on Tue Nov-16-04 10:00 AM by Fortunato
Here's the deal:

Electors are pre-selected by each party (for example, in Ohio, the Rep's have 20 people picked out to represent Ohio if they win the state, while the Dem's have 20 of their own guys picked out). The state of New Hampshire, for example, had a list of its Rep electors and the Dem electors on its site, so you can even see the names and addresses of some of these folks for each state.

Whoever wins the state gets to send THEIR electors to place the votes for the state. If Bush wins Ohio, then his 20 guys (handpicked by Reps) are going to place the vote. If Kerry wins, the Dems' handpicked team is going to do the voting.

See where this is going? Each party is only going to send rabid hard-line supporters as their electors; these guys do not flip. They are chosen specifically by the party because they are as loyal as they come. It would take an extreme and unexpected crisis of almost international proportions (or maybe a complete mental breakdown?) for one of these guys to change their vote to the other major candidate.

And this has pretty much been how it has gone. Occassionally, in a case where it will not change the national election, a rep has offered a protest vote -- but never in favor of the other major party.

--

As far as punishment goes, it depends on state. I'm not sure if electors are yet legally "required" to vote for their candidate in ANY state. This is because it has never really been an issue, so no laws have needed to be passed. (But if the state legislators wanted to pass them, to protect their interests, they would then do so.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC