Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript - Cuyahoga County typo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:41 PM
Original message
Transcript - Cuyahoga County typo
I heard this Saturday, just found the transcript. Does anybody know what they're talking about? And aren't numbers uploaded by database, there shouldn't be any typing of election results, should there?

"In Cuyahoga County, Ohio, one city recorded thousands of ballots more than the actually number of registered voters. Fraud officials say it was a typo. 18,472 should have read 8,472 the mistake never made it into the official count."
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0411/13/nac.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. they probably meant when it was typed up for the website?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. should have been uploaded
From a database. Makes no sense to have a computer system that requires somebody to type from a county database to an online database.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that would make sense
but they keep changing their story too, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if they ment it was a "typo" on the tabulating computer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobbes199 Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Like to see the number of actual voters...
Or was it one of the precincts where the absentee numbers were added in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Would sure like to know more about this. Anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC