Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY: E-vote-counting not welcomed by all counties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 01:05 PM
Original message
NY: E-vote-counting not welcomed by all counties
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 01:29 PM by Bill Bored


Optical scan voting machines not welcomed by all Mid-Hudson counties

By ARIEL ZANGLA
Freeman staff


THE FEDERAL Help America Vote Act of 2002 required, in part, that all states update their voting systems in order to enable individuals with disabilities to vote independently and privately.

In response, New York adopted the Election Reform and Modernization Act of 2005 as a way to implement the federal measure. Now, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x515260">Nassau County has filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state’s act. The suit claims the state act violates the New York Constitution by introducing voting machines that are inaccurate and subject to tampering.

“The crux of the lawsuit is that (the act) violates the state’s Constitution and it does so vis-à-vis the introduction of machines that are inaccurate, subject to tampering and which don’t count votes in a fashion that is consistent with the mandates of New York state law,” said Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli. “So, therefore, the use of these machines can and will result in the disenfranchisement of New York state voters.”

-snip-

“The Help America Vote Act does not mandate a switch to computerized voting machines,” said Dutchess County Legislator Joel Tyner.

-snip-

(H)e will introduce a resolution in the county Legislature, urging it to allow the county Board of Elections to join Nassau’s lawsuit, which he said could be done at no cost to taxpayers.

-snip-

VIRGINIA Martin, the Democratic commissioner of elections in Columbia County, said she and her Republican counterpart support Nassau’s litigation because it challenges the constitutionality of the state’s act.

“We find the Election Reform and Modernization Act unconstitutional because it requires election commissioners, which are constitutional officers, to verify to the accuracy of election results even though http://www.wheresthepaper.org/09/TestimonyInNYCHearingShocksAssemblymembers.htm">we don’t know how those results were compiled,” Martin said.

-snip-

Martin also said computers can be hacked, there could be an error in the programming, the calibration of the machine could be off and the computer cannot interpret the intent of the voter. She said there is no such ambiguity with lever-action machines and they are secure.

If Nassau County’s litigation is successful, Martin said, all counties in the state could be allowed to continue using the old machines.
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democracy Hacked
made me regret voting on a computer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The process of un-hacking democracy starts here!
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 02:32 PM by Bill Bored
When courageous election officials like these come out and say they can't trust the machines, there can be no defense. I wish there were more like them.

Thankfully men and women of good conscience on both sides of the aisle are finally coming forward to stop what we know is an untenable system of voting.

Oh, and in case anyone's thinking New York will "audit" it's way out of this mess with the paper ballots, forget about it! The State Board of Elections, the State Legislature and most county boards of elections, want to AVOID hand counts and have pretty much put the kibosh on any efforts to make them happen.

So as in any situation where all other remedies have been tried and have failed, the courts will be the ones to decide how the votes will be counted or NOT counted in NY.

Under a system that requires computers to do the counting, the courts, rather than the voters, are the ones who would be deciding elections anyway -- unless our candidates are dumb enough to trust the software! So there is nothing to lose and everything to gain by pursuing judicial remedies now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link to the orginal article here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Wedonottrustvotingcomputers"
A group in Netherlands had a very nifty slogan, although their graphic might not fit the pro lever movement.



learn more here
http://wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/English

They did defeat computerized vote counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go Nassau!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. if the litigation is successful, I hope every state will follow suit!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hope our county is successful.
Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fingers crossed for lawsuit's success. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. I like that doormat, Bill.
Edited on Tue Apr-13-10 07:31 PM by Wilms
It's good to see it. For too long, others have put up banners saying; "Come. Rob us."

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC