Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 Ohio justices step down in cases challenging early-voting procedure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:23 AM
Original message
2 Ohio justices step down in cases challenging early-voting procedure
2 Ohio justices step down in cases challenging early-voting procedure

Published:Friday, September 26, 2008

COLUMBUS (AP) — Two Ohio Supreme Court justices removed themselves Thursday from cases involving challenges to early-voting procedures, clearing the way for a Democrat to join the all-Republican court making decisions with partisan implications in a hotly contested swing state this presidential election.

Justices Evelyn Lundberg Stratton and Maureen O’Connor stepped down from deciding a challenge to a weeklong period beginning Sept. 30 during which new voters can register to vote and cast an absentee ballot on the same day. The justices also recused themselves from two separate cases in which voters are challenging Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner’s decision to reject absentee ballot applications administered by the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain because they weren’t filled out properly.

Per normal protocol, the two justices did not provide a reason for stepping aside. But both Republicans are running for re-election on this year’s ballot.

Stratton will be replaced by William Wolff Jr., a Democrat on the Second District Court of Appeals. O’Connor will be replaced by Republican Lynn Slaby of the 9th District Court of Appeals. Both are retiring after completing their current terms.

more at:
http://www.vindy.com/news/2008/sep/26/2-ohio-justices-step-down-in-cases-challenging/
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. How does 1 democrat on a panel of all Republicans suddenly cause the panel
to be impartial?

"Chief Justice Thomas Moyer wanted to ensure that there’s confidence that the decisions are made by an independent and impartial panel, said Ohio Supreme Court spokesman Chris Davey."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
One more rec for the greatest please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shows why Kerry lost Ohio
the entire state was stacked in Bush's favor under Blackwell- and all the crap they pulled against us.
This time, we're ensured a much more level playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC