Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News, Wednesday 05/07/08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:12 PM
Original message
Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News, Wednesday 05/07/08
We Still Could Use An E R News Daily Editor Or Two...
Please PM me if you can help!



Esteemed DUer's, please consider taking a moment (or more)
to graciously participate by posting Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News on this thread.


If you can:
1. Post stories and announcements you find on the web.


2. Post stories using the Spring 2006 Edition of "Election Fraud and Reform News Directory" listed here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x407240

3. Re-post stories and announcements you find on DU, providing a link to the original thread with thanks to the Original Poster, too.


4. Start a discussion thread by re-posting a story you see on this thread.




Please "Recommend" for the Greatest Page (it's the link just below).
Thank You!











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. States n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Indiana-Questions abound over late vote tallies from Indiana county
Questions abound over late vote tallies from Indiana county
By DEANNA BELLANDI | Associated Press Writer
4:10 PM CDT, May 7, 2008

GARY, Ind. - It was midnight and the nation was watching Lake County, still waiting for results in one of the biggest remaining prizes of the epic Democratic presidential battle between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

But as the clock ticked, the questions and accusations grew louder: What was wrong in Lake County? Was this more politics as usual in the county at Lake Michigan's southern tip often seen as an extension of Chicago-style corruption?
"They wanted to put Barack Obama over the top with Lake County's vote and games were being played like in the 1950s," said Hammond Mayor Thomas McDermott, who endorsed Clinton. "It went bad when a lot of people were watching."




The late returns came in a primary that saw record voter turnout across the state. Many counties ran short of Democratic ballots and had to print extras, which had to be counted by hand. Lake County alone had some 11,500 early ballots cast for the primary -- about three times the number cast in the 2004 primary.


snip


Gary, the largest city in Lake County, was being watched closely because of expectations that much of its vote would go to Obama and might propel him to victory in the state, which Clinton needed to win to keep her candidacy alive. The 100,000-person city is about 85 percent black, and its proximity to Obama's hometown of Chicago made it a likely strength for the Illinois senator.


Associated Press Writers Tom Davies and Tom Murphy contributed to this story from
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/wire/chi-ap-indianaprimary-afterm,0,6823125.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Late Lake Co. vote results criticized, explained
Late Lake Co. vote results criticized, explained

219.662.5328 | Wednesday, May 07, 2008 | 41 comment(s)

CROWN POINT | An overwhelming voter turnout, at least one case of votes that were briefly missing and a conscious decision to delay announcing the results Tuesday night left voters wondering who won Indiana's primary.

National pundits publicly accused Lake County election officials of manipulating the release of vote totals, and some local officials speculated that the canvas was being stage managed to build suspense and focus the country's attention on Lake County.

Election officials posted what appeared to be final, unofficial totals about 6 a.m. Wednesday.


snip

However, LaSota said they didn't anticipate a record 11,000 absentee ballots cast in the final days before Tuesday, many of which were paper ballots that had to be meticulously counted by hand. A total of 144,000 votes were cast, almost a 51 percent turnout.

LaSota said she refused to release final results until all the absentee ballots were cast, despite pressure by the national media.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2008/05/07/updates/breaking_news/doc4821d725588d0479316895.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. KY-Grayson Issues Warning About Voter Registration
Thanks to deminks for the post and the DU discussion here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502048


Grayson Issues Warning About Voter Registration

Last Update: 5/06 3:10 pm

Web produced by: Jessica Noll



Secretary of State Trey Grayson issued a warning to Kentucky citizens that his office has learned that a voting group has sent thousands of potentially confusing mailings to women across Kentucky asking them to register to vote.

These mailings could cause confusion for Kentuckians because the deadline to register to vote in the upcoming May primary has already passed.

According to the group, "Women’s Voices. Women Vote." (WVWV), the voter registration mailings were part of a larger nationwide mailing.

Grayson encouraged voters to still consider registering to vote so that they will be eligible for the fall general election, but wanted to make sure that citizens understood that any new registrants registering after the April 21 deadline will not be able to vote in the May primary.

"I appreciate Women’s Voices Women Vote letting us know about this possibly confusing situation for Kentucky voters," stated Secretary Grayson. "It is important to stress that citizens can still register to vote for the November general election, but they will not be eligible to vote and in the upcoming primary."

http://www.kypost.com/content/news/commonwealth/story.aspx?content_id=4ed660a8-1927-41e6-8330-6387bcd9809a


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Colorado election clerks plan only partial use of new system
Colorado election clerks plan only partial use of new system
By Myung Oak Kim, Rocky Mountain News
Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Clerks in several large counties are so nervous about the new $13 million statewide voter registration program that they plan to use their old systems for most Election Day functions this year.

During simulated elections that ended Friday, clerks had problems accessing the system from polling sites and generating data reports. They also said the system, known as SCORE (State of Colorado Registration and Election) slowed down when many poll workers were connected simultaneously.

That's why clerks in Weld, Mesa and Larimer counties plan to use their county systems to check in voters on Election Day. Other clerks also want to limit the use of the new system this year.

SCORE "has great potential, and in a few years it's going to be one slick system," said Sheila Reiner, elections director for Mesa County, which uses electronic voting machines at vote centers. "But right now it's still under development."

Paper poll book in Denver

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/may/06/colo-election-clerks-plan-only-partial-use-of/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. SD: Secretary of State warns against bogus mailings
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2008/05/07/news/local/doc4821fb86d39e6122252733.txt

Secretary of State Chris Nelson is warning South Dakotans that a Boston organization called the “Voter Participation Project” is sending mailings into South Dakota saying residents -- under “state law” -- must re-register to vote. The mailing lists the Secretary of State’s address, adding the appearance of credibility. “The language in this mailing is not true," Nelson said. "This organization is misleading our citizens into thinking they need to fill out another voter registration form in order to vote."

Nelson said he has received a number of complaints about the mailings and that some of the mailings have gone to deceased South Dakotans.

"My elderly mother received a mailing and was concerned that she needed to fill it out in order to vote," Nelson said.

He noted that voters aren't required to re-register when they move, but he does encourage re-registration when they move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. MD- Voter registration rejections sent to 17-year-old voters
Voter registration rejections sent to 17-year-old voters
County is working to correct confusion, lawyer says
by Audrey Dutton | Staff Writer

snip


Maryland teens who thought they were registered to vote were bewildered by a letter sent to them last month by state voting officials.

Seventeen-year-old Bethesda resident Sarah Boltuck cast a provisional ballot in February’s primary election — and legally, her vote counted. It was a triumph for the teen, after months of filing complaints, talking with state legislators and testifying in Annapolis to guarantee suffrage for 17-year-olds who will be 18 by November’s general election.

But on April 24, the Montgomery County Board of Elections sent her a letter that seemed to reverse everything:

‘‘Because you will not be 18 years old or older on or before the next election, you are not yet eligible to register and vote in Montgomery County,” it read.

snip
The board’s attorney Kevin Karpinsky explained it was a sort of glitch in the system. Some 17-year-olds who qualified for general election voting in November were put on temporary ‘‘pending” status. This was to avoid confusing election judges during special elections for Congressional District 4 in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties and County Council District 4 in Montgomery County, and accidentally opening the door to ineligible voters. The change in voting status triggered the state Board of Elections to send registered 17-year-olds the boilerplate letter that Boltuck received.
http://www.gazette.net/stories/050708/chevnew203721_32416.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. National n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8.  Voting Machine, Registration Roll Problems Reported to National Election Protection Hotline...
Brad Blog...
ALSO: Voting Machine, Registration Roll Problems Reported to National Election Protection Hotline...

EP's news release goes on to list a number of other incidents being reported (if not yet by the corporate media) so far during voting today in IN and NC both, including multiple reports of voting machines problems; paper ballots not being offered to voters when machines go down; registered Independent voters being disallowed from voting in either party's primary; or voters being given Republican ballots when they believed they were registered as Democrats.

A few of the specific incidents as reported by EP so far, (which we post along with the usual caveat that frequently the most serious concerns do not come to light, if ever, until the days and weeks following such e-elections) include, from Indiana...


Multiple reports of voting machine problems, including from a school teacher who had to leave without casting a ballot because he had to get to school before classes started. Additionally, he said the mostly African-American voters were untrusting that the poll workers would ensure their votes would count.
At another polling place, voters were not offered paper ballots when machines went down, and countless voters left without casting a ballot.
A voter, previously convicted of a misdemeanor, was prevented from voting by a poll worker. Election Protection provided him with the code provision which dictates that only those convicted of a felony and those incarcerated cannot vote.
...and from North Carolina...

Poll workers at a local precinct announced at 6:20 a.m. that there were no ballots and voters were sent home. Election Protection followed up and discovered that the polling place had the ballots in a box which had not been opened.
Election Protection has also received multiple reports of registered Independents who were not allowed to vote in either primary, or were given Republican ballots despite believing they were registered as Democrats at polling sites.
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5960
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Clinton allegedly won Indiana, and Obama allegedly won North Carolina,
in the sweepstakes for emperor of the U.S.--but these states, and all states in the U.S., use voting systems run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations, with virtually no audit-recount controls, so nobody knows for sure who won these primaries--since, even with a 'paper trail' (which I think they have in NC now, not sure about IN), nobody bothers to count the paper.

The 'vote counting' system in the U.S. of A. would make Stalin blush. And if that isn't election reform news, I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. 'Special Election Coverage' today on Pacifica, with Guest: MO Sec. of State Carnahan
Thanks to Brad for the work, the post, and the DU discusssion here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502096


Brad hosting 'Special Election Coverage' today on Pacifica, with Guest: MO Sec. of State Carnahan
Edited on Wed May-07-08 02:21 PM by BradBlog


Brad Friedman Hosting 'Election Year Special Coverage' Today on KPFK with Special Guest: MO SoS Robin Carnahan
On Air Today (Wed.) at 2pm PT in L.A. and Santa Barbara, and Around the World via the Internets!
Once again today, I'll be hosting an hour of "Special Election Year Coverage", for the good folks at L.A.'s Pacifica Radio affiliate, KPFK 90.7 FM, from 2p-3p PT this afternoon.

And, once again, we'll be looking less at the election "horse race" and much more at the "track conditions", with a special eye on the Supreme Court's unconstitutional support of polling place Photo ID restrictions such as the one that disenfranchised a bunch of 80 & 90 year-old nuns (along with many others) yesterday in Indiana.

My special guest will be MO Sec. of State ROBIN CARNAHAN, joining us to discuss the effect of the SCOTUS ruling in her state, which has been called "Ground Zero" for the phony GOP voter fraud scam. It's no coincidence that MO is the home of GOP Scammer-in-Chief Mark F. "Thor" Hearne, btw, as he's the democracy-hating front-man most single-handedly responsible for the Republican Photo ID/Voter Suppression effort.
We'll also be giving away some stuff to callers, such as a signed Duhmocracy CD and a signed Uncounted DVD. So join us, and call in with your questions at: 818-985-5735.

Tune in live from 2p-3p PT (4p-5p CT, 5p-6p ET) on air in Los Angeles at 90.7 FM, in Santa Barbara at 98.7 FM, or listen live online right here: http://kpfk.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&...

P.S. After the show, I'll be a guest on Voice of the Voters w/ Mary Ann Gould at 4pm PT, and then on People Speak Radio w/ David Swanson at 5pm PT. So it'll be a full day of BradCasting today! Hope you'll spread the word, kick this, and tune in! See "Media Appearances" box on top-right of http://www.bradblog.com for those listening links!

URL: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5963


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Internal Draft Document Reveals Bloch-Headedness
Edited on Wed May-07-08 04:51 PM by Melissa G
Internal Draft Document Reveals Bloch-Headedness

DU discussion here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502119
POGO has gained access to an extraordinary internal document from the Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal agency charged with protecting whistleblowers from reprisal. Clearly marked "DRAFT," it is a memo dated January 18, 2008, to Special Counsel Scott Bloch from the members of a special task force. The task force was created, according to the memo, in May 2007, "to pursue certain complex and high profile investigations, such as the firing of the U.S. Attorneys and the political presentations given by the White House Office of Political Affairs (OPA)." The stated subject of the memo is "Summary of Task Force Activities and Recommendations," but it reads at times like an anguished cry from investigators charged with an important mission but virtually every recommendation they make is countermanded by their boss. If they recommend going forward with an inquiry, Bloch says no. If they say they lack evidence or jurisdiction, he orders them to go forward.

The inescapable conclusion reached from poring through the contents of this 13-page memo is that Bloch was deliberately creating the impression of a huge ongoing multi-faceted investigation of the White House--at the same time that he himself was being investigated by another arm of the White House for various forms of misconduct.

Here is my analysis, along with some juicy quotes.

Office of Political Affairs:
The task force (TF) began to examine allegations that 25 federal agencies had received political briefings from the White House Office of Political Affairs that may have violated Hatch Act bans against the use of government resources to promote or oppose a political party or candidate. The task force received hundreds of documents from the agencies and thousands from the White House about the briefings. But as the investigators proceeded in their classic methodical way, they received new directions from their boss: transfer a Hatch Act complaint against Commerce Secretary Gutierrez from the Hatch Act Unit to the task force); merge two complaints against Karl Rove into the ongoing OPA investigation; draft new requests for information to the White House demanding copies of all email sent or received by 50 OPA employees from January 2001 through November 2007, from both the employees' government accounts and their RNC accounts.

snip
But there was more. The Special Counsel demanded that the TF seek even more records from the White House: all travel records on Air Force One; all procedures for telephone and fax machines; all grant awards, etc. Again the protest from the task force: "After reviewing all documentation received and finding no information or evidence to suggest that agencies directed grants or agency resources to help candidates or political parties TF believes this request is overly broad."

The task force recommended ways to narrow the investigation, but Bloch denied them. When the task force drafted a letter and subpoena to the RNC, Bloch returned the draft with the order that it be expanded to include ten new topics.

U.S. Attorney Firings:

more...

http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2008/05/internal-draft.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Press release: Election Protection Off to a Great Start Assisting Primary Election Voters in North C
Election Protection Off to a Great Start Assisting Primary Election Voters in North Carolina and Indiana


Nearly 400 Hotline Calls So Far Reporting Primary Election Barriers


WASHINGTON, May 6 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Election Protection, the nation's largest nonpartisan voter protection coalition, together with a diverse group of partners, is in high gear helping voters in Indiana and North Carolina cast meaningful ballots through a comprehensive voter protection program. Volunteers will be available throughout the day to continue assisting Primary Election Day voters with questions and to ensure that all voters know their rights. Voters in both states can call 1-866-OUR-VOTE toll-free until 8 p.m. EDT with any questions or issues that arise at polling areas.


Election Protection is monitoring issues surrounding Indiana's photo identification law. This morning, in South Bend, Indiana, a freshman student at St. Mary's College, excited to vote for the first time, left the polling place in tears because she only possessed a private college ID and was unable to vote. The poll workers, nuns at a local convent, were trying to help the young student through her problem. While they were helping her, they realized that some of their fellow nuns, who had just arrived at the polling place, also could not vote because of the photo ID law. Not only was this group of nuns disenfranchised, but so would be four floors of retired nuns in their convent.


"The situation this morning in South Bend is a glaring example of why Indiana's onerous photo ID law erects an unnecessary barrier to the ballot box and disenfranchises legitimate voters," said John Borkowski, Esquire, a partner at law firm Hogan & Hartson and Lawyers' Committee board member who witnessed this incident firsthand.


Other incidents from Indiana include:


Multiple reports of voting machine problems, including from a school teacher who had to leave without casting a ballot because he had to get to school before classes started. Additionally, he said the mostly African-American voters were untrusting that the poll workers would ensure their votes would count.
At another polling place, voters were not offered paper ballots when machines went down, and countless voters left without casting a ballot.
A voter, previously convicted of a misdemeanor, was prevented from voting by a poll worker. Election Protection provided him with the code provision which dictates that only those convicted of a felony and those incarcerated cannot vote.





Specific incidents reported in North Carolina include:


Poll workers at a local precinct announced at 6:20 a.m. that there were no ballots and voters were sent home. Election Protection followed up and discovered that the polling place had the ballots in a box which had not been opened.
Election Protection has also received multiple reports of registered Independents who were not allowed to vote in either primary, or were given Republican ballots despite believing they were registered as Democrats at polling sites.


Trained volunteers will continue to staff the Hotline to provide voters with free assistance and volunteers will remain at election officials' offices in targeted areas across North Carolina and Indiana. Field volunteers are on the ground to assist voters in person or place telephone calls to the appropriate election official.


The toll-free number, administered by the Lawyers' Committee is available to any voters who need information, assistance or need guidance in understanding their rights. It is open to the entire voting public, but targets historically disenfranchised communities, including Hispanic, African American and low-income communities.


The Lawyers' Committee, along with primary May 6 partners, Democracy North Carolina, the Brennan Center for Justice and NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and other partners across both states recruited, trained and deployed legal volunteers to help voters at the polls, in the courts and through the 1-866-OUR-VOTE Hotline. As Election Protection's interim report on previous primaries across the country this election year suggests, the infrastructure that supports the nation's election system often breaks down preventing countless eligible voters from accessing their right to vote.


For more information about Election Protection and the 1-866-OUR-VOTE and Hotline, or to read the Lawyers' Committee's report, please visit www.866ourvote.org.


The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a nonpartisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice, including voting rights and fair elections. Visit www.brennancenter.org for more.


The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (LCCRUL), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, was formed in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy to involve the private bar in providing legal services to address racial discrimination. The principal mission of the Lawyers' Committee is to secure, through the rule of law, equal justice under law, particularly in the areas of housing, community development, employment, voting, education and environmental justice. For more information about the LCCRUL, visit www.lawyerscommittee.org.

Website: http://www.866ourvote.org/
Website: http://www.brennancenter.org/
Website: http://www.lawyerscommittee.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Camp Obama, Camp Clinton
Camp Obama, Camp Clinton
It was an especially tough, close fight for votes in Indiana yesterday. The DC Wire is again turning to District residents Tom Smith and Jason Berry, the Clinton and Obama volunteers respectively who've been blogging from the ground war.

Camp Obama: Jason Berry

Hi Washington,

snip


One older women asked me "is this a real election? - does it count? Isn't the election in November"? I patiently explained to her the primary process and helped get her to her polling location - 1 more vote! Other volunteers had similar stories and stories about people not realizing they were registered or knowing where to vote. It was reported that the Governor (a Clinton Supporter) even got confused and went to the wrong voting location.

This was all because they consolidated many polling locations in the last 2-12 months.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Camp Clinton: Tom Smith

snip

Many of my friends in DC sent me news stories in recent days speculating on the impact of the new Indiana state law requiring all voters to show a federal or state-issued ID in order to vote. Many of my friends here were convinced the new law was designed to discourage turnout, especially in the African American community. I served as an authorized poll watcher on election day in a heavily African-American part of Indianapolis and - like most polling places across the state - there was a record turnout.

snip
As a poll watcher, I observed some would-be voters giving names to the poll workers that were on the voter registration rolls, but whose IDs did not match their face - or whose names on the ID were different than the name they gave to the poll worker to obtain a ballot.

The polling place was not without other problems as well. Having four different precincts vote in the same polling place was confusing for voters and slowed up lines during the day. Police were called to the polling place where I worked because of a fight that broke out between Clinton and Obama supporters.

I saw people taking voters to the voting machines and voting for them without the oversight of an elections judge and without filing the proper affidavit authorizing such voting assistance. Because poll workers did not know how to properly handle provisional ballots, many voters who should have been voting provisional ballots were simply waved ahead to the voting machines instead of being required to vote on a provisional ballot.

more...
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dc/2008/05/camp_obama_camp_clinton_1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. International n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Editorial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Elderly Indiana Nuns Can't Vote - Nuns Don't Have ID
May 6, 2008
Elderly Indiana Nuns Can't Vote - Nuns Don't Have ID
Even though there has never been a case of voter fraud in Indiana the Republican Supreme Court upheld an Indiana voter-suppression law forbidding the elderly, poor and minorities from voting because they have trouble obtaining ID. (These groups tend to vote Democratic.)

It was estimated that this law would prevent approx. 43,000 people from voting. Here is an example of the law's effect: Indiana nuns lacking ID denied at poll,

About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place ... because they didn't have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.

. . . The nuns, all in their 80s or 90s, didn't get one but came to the precinct anyway.

. . . Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.

They weren't given provisional ballots because it would be impossible to get them to a motor vehicle branch and back in the 10-day time frame allotted by the law, Sister McGuire said. "You have to remember that some of these ladies don't walk well. They're in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts."

http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/elderly_indiana.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Nuns, Students Blocked from Voting in Indiana -- Where's Congress?



Nuns, Students Blocked from Voting in Indiana -- Where's Congress?
Posted May 6, 2008 | 08:05 PM (EST)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As voters went to the polls today to choose between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in the Indiana and North Carolina primaries, there was an overlooked peril facing all voters this year: a failing election system and GOP-led vote suppression. All these obstacles undermine fair and accurate voting, leading to potential meltdowns and the disenfranchisement of voters, especially African-Americans, the elderly and students.

Indeed, the Election Protection coalition reported by mid-afternoon some disturbing accounts from the Indiana and North Carolina primaries from early callers to their 1-866-Our-Vote hotline. All told, by day's end, the coalition hotline fielded nearly 800 complaints about election barriers. As Election Protection reported earlier on Tuesday:

This morning, in South Bend, Indiana, a freshman student at St. Mary's College, excited to vote for the first time, left the polling place in tears because she only possessed a private college ID and was unable to vote. The poll workers, nuns at a local convent, were trying to help the young student through her problem. While they were helping her, they realized that some of their fellow nuns, who had just arrived at the polling place, also could not vote because of the photo ID law. Not only was this group of nuns disenfranchised, but so would be four floors of retired nuns in their convent. "The situation this morning in South Bend is a glaring example of why Indiana's onerous photo ID law erects an unnecessary barrier to the ballot box and disenfranchises legitimate voters," said John Borkowski, Esquire, a partner at law firm Hogan & Hartson and Lawyers' Committee board member who witnessed this incident firsthand.
Why didn't the TV pundits take more notice of these incidents while describing the Indiana primary results as too close to call in Indiana as the evening wore on? Indeed, when you add in Obama-leaning minorities and students turned away from the polls because they lacked the proper photo ID, along with Rush Limbaugh's Republican dittoheads turning up to vote for Hillary as part of "Operation Chaos," the narrowness of the difference between the two candidates would doubtless have been even slimmer had there been a truly fair vote.
So when every vote counts, it's important that our election officials fairly and honestly count every voter -- a lesson progressives need to learn before the expected close election in November. That's in part because they can't count on a Democratic-led Congress, as Alternet reports this week, to take any action that can protect voting rights and our election system before the November election.

As Jonah Goldman, director of the National Campaign for Fair Elections of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Right's Voting Rights Project, concluded, "As this historic primary season has progressed, record numbers of voters have turned out to exercise their fundamental right to vote. It is unfortunate, however, that many of these eligible voters were disenfranchised and unable to cast a ballot. In state after state, including both North Carolina and Indiana, we've seen eligible voters lose their right to vote because of poorly trained poll workers, problems with voting machines and inaccurate voter registration rolls." It's equally unfortunate that Congress and most state governments won't be doing anything to stop these abuses and problems that undermine our democracy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/art-levine/nuns-students-blocked-fro_b_100489.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Students, Nuns Denied RIGHT to Vote in Indiana Today Following Supreme Court Approval of State Photo
BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 5/6/2008 1:37PM
Students, Nuns Denied RIGHT to Vote in Indiana Today Following Supreme Court Approval of State Photo ID Restrictions, Says Nonpartisan Watchdog Group


The Supreme Court's recent, outrageous approval of Indiana's restrictive and disenfranchising Photo ID law --- better described as their Voter Suppression Act, despite Scalia's claim that "the burden at issue is minimal," to him, anyway --- is already "working" to disenfranchise legal voters, denying them their right to cast ballots like everyone else.

According to EP, it's not just veterans, elderly, and minorities who are being affected by the ruling, so are young voters and, yes, nuns, who have reportedly already been disenfranchised today under the Republican law...

This morning, in South Bend, Indiana, a freshman student at St. Mary's College, excited to vote for the first time, left the polling place in tears because she only possessed a private college ID and was unable to vote. The poll workers, nuns at a local convent, were trying to help the young student through her problem. While they were helping her, they realized that some of their fellow nuns, who had just arrived at the polling place, also could not vote because of the photo ID law. Not only was this group of nuns disenfranchised, but so would be four floors of retired nuns in their convent.
Remember, the law was upheld by the Supremes just last week, despite Indiana's inability to point to a single instance of in-person, polling place, voter impersonation fraud (the type of "voter fraud" the law was purportedly meant to deter) in the entire history of the state.

UPDATE: Brad Jacobson has more on the dangerous "roaming pack of octogenarian and nonagenarian hooligans attempted to exercise their right to vote," including one of them, a clearly-up-to-no-good, 98 year-old, trouble maker who Catholic Antonin Scalia and friends don't believe deserves the right to cast a ballot.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5960
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Op from Bowen: Poll workers stand on the front lines of democracy
Poll workers stand on the front lines of democracy


By Debra Bowen
» More from Debra Bowen
12:01 a.m. PT May 7, 2008

Poll workers on the front lines of democracy

Each election, Californians see snapshots of what makes our democracy tick. Candidates. Initiative measures. Campaign commercials. Voter registration drives. Ballots and the machines that count them.

One crucial element that's often overlooked is the contribution from the state's largest one-day volunteer work force: The 100,000 men and women who serve on the front lines of democracy as poll workers.

Teenagers and senior citizens, professionals and retirees, people of all backgrounds come together to ensure all of the more than 23,000 polling places across California are staffed on Election Day. Poll workers make voting easier and they protect our ballots until they are delivered to county election officials.

For their valuable service, poll workers take home modest stipends. But they walk away with so much more a sense of community, a chance to reconnect with neighbors and friends, first-hand experience with democracy, and personal satisfaction.
http://theunion.com/article/20080507/OPINION/30589580
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Action n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. VOTE FOR CHANGE an unprecedented 50-state voter registration and mobilization drive
Edited on Wed May-07-08 12:51 PM by Melissa G
Thanks to mod mom for the post and the DU discussion here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502074

(ed note)I'm ignoring that this is attached to a candidate because I believe the scale of effort of voter registration is newsworthy.

VOTE FOR CHANGE an unprecedented 50-state voter registration and mobilization drive

OPEN TO ALL!

On May 10th, Barack Obama is launching Vote for Change, an unprecedented 50-state voter registration and mobilization drive. More than 100 events will be held across the country that day. Obama volunteers will register new voters as the start of a six-month voter registration drive.

We can change Washington if more Americans get involved, get registered and show up to vote on November 4th. If millions of new voters get involved, a powerful message will be sent to the special interests that dominate the old politics. This is an important time to find more people in your community to register to vote. To attend a May 10th Vote for Change launch event in your area, click on your state above.

Recent voter registration drives have registered more than 200,000 new Democrats in Pennsylvania, more than 165,000 new Democrats in North Carolina, and more than 150,000 new Democrats in Indiana. Those numbers just scratch the surface of what's possible.

snip
from DU"s mod mom...

PLEASE HELP GROW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY! Here's the event I will be working:


Columbus Vote for Change Rally
Saturday, May 10 @ 10 am
Obama for America Ohio Headquarters
193 East Rich Street, Columbus
614/224-8600

This is an unprecedented 50-state voter registration drive with over 100 events across the country and in all 50 states, and will serve as a kickoff to a 6 month voter registration drive. Come to a Rally at Obama for America Ohio Headquarters (Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman will speak), enjoy donut/bagels/grab-n-go food and then head out to assigned locations.

By registering voters we can help Democrats prevail at all levels of the ticket in November and make sure we can achieve the change we want to see in Washington. Showing up and registering voters will show America that Ohio is going to VOTE FOR CHANGE overwhelmingly in November and that Ohioans won't stand for a politics of cynicism any longer.


We are also looking for volunteers to phone bank to other volunteers to inform them of this event:

Weds May 7, Thursday May 8 or Friday May 9
10 am until 9 pm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Get The News Out about Election Reform!
Daily News Editors needed for Thursdays and maybe one other day.
PM Melissa G or any of the Election Reform daily editors if you are interested!
Thank You! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. R and a kick to the top!
Thanks, Melissa G. :*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Thank you for the assistance!
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Ask your County Court to stop funding DRE's or other insecure voting machines!
Here is something we are doing locally in Austin (Travis County, TX) that could be duplicated in other cities, if you are not already doing so. We are talking to our elections officials, but we are also talking to the folks that fund them.

Reading highlights from the studies done by the SOS's of California and Ohio plus the whistle blower lawsuits makes good television. Studies show in Austin, about 150,000 folks are watching the local and cable news channel at any given time. Reading highlights from the studies along with impassioned pleas fro change and personal stories of problems like voting machine sleepovers (48 hours of unfettered access in Travis county) is a great way to get the word out about Election reform!
DU discussion here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502029

original DU message from Melissa G
Ask your County Court to stop funding DRE's or other insecure voting machines!

I just got back from testifying about the insecure nature of our votes on Hart voting machines. Person after person testified from excerpts of the California study, The Ohio Study and various lawsuits. At some point, the commissioners got tired of listening and asked us if someone was going to get around to asking them for something. So I did.

I told them that a bunch of us across the country worked very hard to get folks elected into Congress that would stop the war. That was documented as the main reason we elected them. Congress holds the purse strings and could stop the war if it wanted to. We have unfortunately been disappointed on that issue.

BUT we were in Travis County, where we do things right. We have been showing the court instance after instance of the corruptibility of Hart Inter civic voting machines. The Court has the power to cut off the purse strings for these insecure machines. Yes, we are talking to the folks who run the elections where we live, but folks often use the excuse "Well someone else funded these machines, so we have to use them" and we get caught in Catch 22 situations.

If our County courts and equivalents to county courts around the nation stop funding voting machines, then the folks who run elections will have to do something different. We will keep talking to the folks who run the elections as well, but we must also ask our commissioners to cut off the funding for these insecure, potentially vote stealing machines.

Ask Your County Court or local area funding body today!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x502029
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC