Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Observer reports on Edison/Mitofsky polling procedures in South Carolina

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:02 PM
Original message
Observer reports on Edison/Mitofsky polling procedures in South Carolina
Observer reports on Edison/Mitofsky polling procedures in South Carolina
by Steven Freeman 1/27/2008 6:43:00 AM




This terrific report comes from long time election activist Marj Creech, who was observing the Democratic Party primary election in South Carolina yesterday. She spent 90 minutes at a precinct being exit polled by Edison/Mitofsky. Also note the “curbside voting” provisions made for one voter. Marj is en route to Florida for continued election observation. Join us in wishing her the keenest eye and the best of luck.





I just witnessed how this exit poll, carried out by Edison/Mitofsky, was done in SC. I was in only one precinct in Greenville, SC, and was surprised to find one exit pollster, sitting at a small table (they gave her a child's desk, she said) She simply asked each voter, as they left the voting area if they would like to be part of the "media exit poll." Behind her was a sign saying CNN and other TV stations. She was a very personable black woman, and not pushy at all; she was a little tired and had been there all day from 7 am and would be there till 7 pm, with an hour for lunch. I didn't ask her how much she was paid, but she seemed happy enough to be doing the job. She admitted to me that she did not believe the surveys she was taking would be the same as the results of the election taking place there, so I said, "Well no, but how about if they combine ALL the exit polling places results; don't you think the official results might match then?" She said no because she went to lunch and missed a lot of voters. I don't think she understood what I was saying. She did not know how many polls were being taken across the state.



Approximately one in three voters took a survey form, and sat there and filled it out, by pencil placing a check in the choices. The form was two-sided and had maybe 20 questions. At first she was going to give me a form, but after I left and came back, she decided she had to keep track of all the forms. They were on a pad of maybe 100? forms and she had three pads. There were too many questions, she told me, and people didn't want to take the time to fill them out. By the way she asked she was biased toward letting people go without filling them out – the size of the seating space and the fact that she was just one person influenced her I think.



The questions on the form (people would occasionally read them to me) were subjective and not just who they voted for, but about their church going/religion and the "Bill factor," simply if Bill's presence in the campaign influenced Hillary's vote. It also asked race, age, and gender. I don't know what else was asked since I never got to read the form. One woman sitting next to me said there were many questions she could not choose any of the choices alone about what influenced her to vote as she did.



She had to CALL in THE RESULTS as soon as the polls closed, probably on her cell phone.

more at:
http://www.electionintegrity.org/blogengine/post/2008/01/Observer-reports-on-EdisonMitofsky-polling-procedures-in-South-Carolina.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Curbside voting!

Call the cops!11!!

So Steve, have you really never heard of curb-side voting? I mean, I'd assume an reformer worth their salt would know. Or is the faux outrage right oughtta of the playbook?

Reading thru that meandering post left me with one question in particular: What's your point?.

P.S. How's the book selling?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edison/Mitofsky? Weren't they the pollsters who rigged
the exit polls in 2004 to hide the fact that the bushes rigged the election? I wouldn't trust their results any further than I can throw them against a 50 mile an hour wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, they were the 2004 exit pollsters who refuse to disclose certain key parts of their data...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Aren't they just refusing in order to protect the polleez?
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:42 PM by yowzayowzayowza
With voter data in hand the exit poll responses could be used to identify individuals thus violating the confidentiality promised the pollee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC